Why does collarme... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Anewd -> Why does collarme... (8/17/2009 11:27:10 PM)

Why does collarme have a prohibition against nudity in profile pictures but hosts advertising with full nudity? 




GreedyTop -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/17/2009 11:31:59 PM)

havent noticed that prohibition lately, given the number of guys who post pics of their dicks (most of which are NOT at all attractive.. I mean seriously.. how many people REALLY wanna see a guy wankin?)




ResidentSadist -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 12:08:55 AM)

I had been gone for a while but, when I came back a few weeks ago, I noticed there are no restrictions now. Full close up nudity, closeup oral/vaginal intercourse and etc is now in the profiles.




VanityFix -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 12:31:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anewd

Why does collarme have a prohibition against nudity in profile pictures but hosts advertising with full nudity? 


pornstars and models are pretty.. granted most people would post pictures of them, i dont think its worth the risk of the avatar of a 600lbs hairy uncircumsized hunchback




RealSub58 -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 1:41:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

havent noticed that prohibition lately, given the number of guys who post pics of their dicks (most of which are NOT at all attractive.. I mean seriously.. how many people REALLY wanna see a guy wankin?)



mmmwwwwaaawwww????
Men show dicks?
So then do women show janes?

Look, it's Dick and he is having fun with Jane!




cpK69 -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 2:18:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

havent noticed that prohibition lately, given the number of guys who post pics of their dicks (most of which are NOT at all attractive.. I mean seriously.. how many people REALLY wanna see a guy wankin?)


I was completely wowed by the one of the guy whose balls hang down around his knees.

“Wow, I bet we could almost play jump rope! Get on your knees and  hold that end; lets see what we can do!”

Kim




TurboJugend -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 2:29:09 AM)

I think they stopped checking pictures completely. There is no waiting time anymore when you post a new profile picture. ( at least it shows emmediately in the online list of people)

One thing I learned the last week. NEver eat while watching profiles. Some nasty pics pass by and will make you loose appetite




pompeii -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 3:39:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop
guys who post pics of their dicks (most of which are NOT at all attractive.. I mean seriously.. how many people REALLY wanna see a guy wankin?)


What's funny is that men LIKE looking at pics of naked women, i.e., women who post pictures of their pussy.
To men, it's VERY attractive.
Lots and lots of men want to see a woman playing with herself (or, better yet, playing with another woman).

Point is ... it's quite NATURAL for men to post pics of their dicks and of them wanking off.

Coupled with the desire to show a picture that does not show their recognizable face, it seems, to men, perfectly natural to post a picture of their dicks. I mean, are they gonna post pics of their elbows?

Now, you'll see that I don't post a pic of my dick so, etiquette rules ... but really ... given the following, how could one expect men not to post pics of their dicks?

FACTS (as I see them - my personal opinion):
- Many men don't want their face picture in their public profile
- This is a sexually oriented web site (hence sexually oriented profile pics)
- Men LIKE seeing women post pics of their sexual body parts
- Men ENJOY seeing a woman playing with herself
-Men EXPECT (without reason) women to be more like they are

Hence ... men (not all ... just many) post pics of their dics and of them wanking off ...
It is what it is.




TurboJugend -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 3:44:43 AM)

quote:

women who post pictures of their pussy.
To men, it's VERY attractive.


some pictures are far from exciting. Or perhaps I had a weak moment...lol




ifallforwomen -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 4:34:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

havent noticed that prohibition lately, given the number of guys who post pics of their dicks (most of which are NOT at all attractive.. I mean seriously.. how many people REALLY wanna see a guy wankin?)

quote:

havent noticed that prohibition lately, given the number of guys who post pics of their dicks (most of which are NOT at all attractive.. I mean seriously.. how many people REALLY wanna see a guy wankin?)


Hi,

I totally agree with you on this: a man's dick is so banal as it reflects something ugly, vulgar (no class). To me it represents simply a dead end at trying to seduce or attract. Who wants to think of a dick only as a dick? Not interesting...But female pictures of their genitalias...well now we're talking: they represent the Center of Universe...that's much more powerful, sexy and infinitely charismatic..the stronger sex IS woman.




TurboJugend -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 4:53:28 AM)

quote:

Not interesting...But female pictures of their genitalias...well now we're talking: they represent the Center of Universe...that's much more powerful, sexy and infinitely charismatic..the stronger sex IS woman.


..and then she woke up  :P
seriously...as with many things...beauty is in the eye of the beholder.





GotSteel -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 4:56:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anewd

Why does collarme have a prohibition against nudity in profile pictures but hosts advertising with full nudity? 


The ads comply with 18 U.S.C. §2257 the nude profile pictures don't.




TurboJugend -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 5:05:47 AM)

quote:


6.3.        You acknowledge and understand that some of the Materials contain graphic visual depictions of sexual activity and nudity, graphic audio portions of the same kind of content, and descriptions of sexually oriented and sexually explicit activities.  You acknowledge that You are aware of the nature of the Materials provided by Our Website and that You are not offended by such Materials, and to the contrary, that You are accessing this Website specifically because You enjoy such expressive content and You wish to view such Materials.  You stipulate that you access this Website freely, voluntarily, and willingly, and for Your own personal enjoyment.


from the TOS, made me laugh :P
Guess this part is new?




GreedyTop -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 6:17:23 AM)

~FR~

The thing, for me, is that when I see a profile (male or female) that the only pic(s) offered are of the genitalia, all I can think is "Is this what you consider to be your BEST asset?  Seriously?"




FullCircle -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 6:33:24 AM)

"For heaven's sake girl it's a male member, it's not a cobra"

Mr Dean 1909[8|]




DesFIP -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/18/2009 11:01:57 PM)

Models in ads all submit paperwork that states name and age. Prior to now with the new age sign in, individuals on the site were not promising to be of age. Federal law requirement.




FullCircle -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/19/2009 3:13:21 AM)

Does this mean that on those nude ads for similar profiles sites like this ALT, AFF etc. that those pictures are not real people but models?




lizi -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/19/2009 8:20:03 AM)

The profile nudity is mystifying when the user is not -as others have pointed out- model quality. And most of us are just regular folks and not model quality [:)]

The strangest thing I have seen (so far!) is the guy who posted as his avatar and the first pic on his profile a woman on her knees completely nude. It was an extreme closeup of her entire vaginal area as viewed from the back. It wasn't attractive, the woman was morbidly obese and it looked as though she had genital warts. Yes...this was his best shot at attracting a female partner - showing the hooha of the last woman he screwed and letting the potential female know he probably had a STD as well.
I swear this is true lol.

As TurboJugend noted not eating when perusing profiles on CM is a wise step to take now that anyone can post literally anything they want.




cloudboy -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/19/2009 8:44:27 AM)


Its probably that CM does not want responsibility for nude pics from members, whereas advertisers must defend the pictures associated with their web sites and advertising.

In sum, its not the nudity itself, but responsibility and liability for the content presented.




Rhodes85 -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/19/2009 7:24:12 PM)

'The ads comply with 18 U.S.C. §2257 the nude profile pictures don't. '

Quite true. What the law basically means is that any nude image of a person posted on this kind of website requires paperwork that states (with actual physical proof...be it birth certificate, drivers license, etc..) the models actual age is indeed 18+. the 'age verifier' on this site doesn't even come close to satisfying that requirement. Incidently that law also states that the site is responsible for any content they themselves 'approve' of for posting. In this case peoples user pics. I find the pics they have somewhat disturbing on here considering there are indeed many full nude pics of people here. Thats not what concerns me, rather that since no actual age verification exists here, theres a strong possibility that many of the images are of underage people. Can you say 'felony distribution of child porn'? On a slightly related topic, the fact that so many people post pics that don't belong to them in fake accounts or whatever, could get this site in a major situation if the actual owner happens across said pics, or if they turn out to be underage. The fact that this site collects and sells said sites (incidently in violation of copyright law fyi, I checked) scares the hell out of me. I wouldn't want to be selling pics of people who's age I couldn't verify. Especially nude ones.

and to the OP....you're right, the full nude pics are in violation of their TOS...even says in the upload window 'no explicit genital nudity' and they approve them anyway....am I the only one that finds that a bit odd?




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875