RubberWitch
Posts: 1368
Joined: 7/27/2005 Status: offline
|
The question could be seen as one of, is the need for a single experience greater than the need to enjoy subsequent experiences? I attend an all you can eat sushi bar. I could, hypothetically, eat myself to death, enjoying salmon nigri until the moment of my demise. I do not. I eat (slightly more than) my fill, and whilst I could eat more, my enjoyment would not be heightened by it. When I sub, a little bit of my brain keeps this allegory in mind, and while I enjoy a few things that could gain my partner an attempted murder charge, my passion for future experience. I want to feel close to death, but I want to feel close to death again next time. Please, remember that whilst we do discuss ideas like addiction here, addicts don't just buy 2lb of coke and an enema syringe, they buy a set bag, and spend as much time cutting, measuring, recutting, and preparing a perfect hit, as they do actually floating (actually, a damn site more time). OK, that uou taken care of, now your top. Back to the drug allegory, a hypodermic is a passive tool. it doesn't decide, "hey, lets see what an extra couple of grams will do to this schmuck", and if you're not in a state to say no, then well, they go to far, and you're screwwed, so.... Old chestnut warning Communication is key. you need to 100% trust that if you're screaming and drooling through a ballgag moremoremoremore, that your top will have the good sense to stop before he removes something that won't grow back. If you're lust for leisions has led you to find someone who has bonesaws by the bed, and stores his copy of Grays Anatomy next to his copy of the Atkins diet, then yup, thats too far. (but could you ask him to sent be the oyster pallettes?) ]V[
|