ANRsub -> RE: When your property already carries a mark (8/26/2009 3:47:43 PM)
|
In reply to "You just made my point for me... so "insecure", they need to PROVE something to another. Those who are secure, don't need to PROVE anything to anyone; including themselves. If someone needs to mark (or be marked) to PROVE one belongs to you (or that said person belongs to another), then I find that insecure. You may not... I do. GASP... a different opinion from your own... oh the horror of it all!!! " Please read the below : From a bit of experience in the Navy, the bit about having one's ship or some special unit-mark tatoo'd ISN'T about insecurity, it is about PRIDE, wanting others in that service to know whence they draw their pride and sense of community. The difference twixt insecurity and pride is HUGE. I would expect someone in this community, one in which there are many seeking to belong-to another, and to be proud of them and that status, to possibly understand that, While it isn't universal anymore about sailors all having tattoo's, (Some of us had to avoid "Identifying marks, scars, or tattoo's") I understand the reasoning. Opinion noted. logical fallacy recognized and dealt-with. ANRsub
|
|
|
|