mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rightwinghippie
Mnot, I am glad you agree with me that it is a purely Political Party based move. And that SOT was incorrect in pretending, "this is not a partisan matter at all."
I do not agree with anything of the like......I was going to let you off the hook, as I so often have......remember, it wasn't me who did you in the last time.......but here are some of your quotes on this thread, none out of context, in fact some are complete postings:
quote:
ORIGINAL: rightwinghippie
Wow, I had allways thought there was a bit of exxxageration to people complaigning about Kenedy, but I guess I was wrong. What an absolute scumbag. The Dems really need to knock this shit off. The idea of being a nation of laws, matters.
What Kenedy is attempting to do now is a disgusting corruption of the concept of the Rule of Law. And he deserves to be called on it.
He is absolulty asking for the law to be changed. Asking for it to changed back from what he asked for before. 4 years ago.
I stand by my assertion that this is a perversion of the concept of rule of law. IF you just switch it nilly willy so you side gets power no matter what, its a joke. And it's not a joke. These are the very real bonds of social contract that keep violence to a minimum and society functioning. To screw with them is very dangerous. Thats not hyperbole.
The only reason they are trying to change the law is power. Using a dying man to do it, is rather scummy.
They are not putting it infront of the electorate.
Trying to avoid criticism by using the man's health is really scummy.
And more important it is an appeal to emotion, not reason, which you can certainly agree with me is not a good thing for republics, right?
I suppose it is up to the voters of Mass to decide, but It seems wrong to waste millions of tax dollars durring a crisis, getting a special law to keep one party in power.
But that's how Dems roll...
I am all in favor of him not dying, but that doesn't really matter.
The voters choose to elect him with his health problems, and the law as it is. That was thier will. Now he wants to change it, and is using his health to tug the heartstrings for support.
There is no reason at all to change the law (which costs a lot of money to do) except to keep Power in the Democrats hands.
Sorry you don't like it being pointed out.
Now, you write on another thread:
quote:
ORIGINAL: rightwinghippie
It's the job of the Senators and Representatives to decide how to vote on these things Mnot. Righty tighty fluff aside. At least Republicans can run a Government. Put the Dems in complete charge, and they still run around in circles blaming Republicans and voters, yammering about midterms. There is allways a midterm coming up.
Are you missing something? Its hard to tell. You seem to be in disagreement with the lefties. It is still quite a vauge thing that there doesn't seem to be an actuall "Dem Plan". To me it would seem easier to sell an actuall plan, but obviously the Dem Leadership disagrees. I agree with you, probably no health bill while the Dems run the show, though I reach that conclusion through a different route.
And immediately after your post, I point out that they are not there to vote their own self-interest. Your retort (which kinda reminds me of a bitch clawing about like she's to be punked):
quote:
ORIGINAL: rightwinghippie
OK, now I understand your confusion.
Your representatives are not your personal representative. You are no more important to them, than any other constiutuant of thiers. I am not sure what your districts are, so I will use some made up numbers. Your congress man has 20,000+ other constituants. Your sentor has a million+. Why would your opinion rule over all the others? Think about how unreasonable that is.
So if you start with that profound a misconception on how the world works, no wonder you are upset and spouting profanity like that. 3 sentances- 2 fuckers, 2 shits, and a cocksucker....
And I am not trying to sell you anything. Why would I waste my time doing that? I am trying to convince the non contributing readers of this thread, that my viewpoint has validity more often than not. Cause I am a geek like that.
So, with the evidence before me, his unilaterally trying to advance the cause for his state (as he sees it, self-interest and all, because; I gotta believe he thinks he has done a hell of a lotta good for his state). Is something wholly repugnant to you, and causes you to do a complete 180 on your view, because he's a democrat. Now had it been George W. Bush, or hell, even FirmHandKY who advanced a notion like this, you would be felch the works of them.....
So, this little vignette should be sufficient cause to inform folks that you will talk out of both sides of your mouth, if you can disparage anything that is not republican. You did it when you pretended to be someone else, you will do it while you are pretending to be you.
But you are going to have problems forcing people to believe that you have a reasoned logic behind you.
Ron
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|
RE: Ted Kennedy - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread