happylittlepet
Posts: 289
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: littlewonder quote:
ORIGINAL: happylittlepet quote:
ORIGINAL: littlewonder if it were me in your situation I think I would feel a little embarrassed, even ashamed to expect my Dom to take care of me if we didn't live together. Being an adult means I should be capable of taking care of myself and finding the means to do so...unemployment, soup kitchens, downsizing, cutting back on expenses....such as your internet service. I could see if you were living together or you are married, but you don't even live together. I understand that, but I don't agree. And here in Ontario it's like this: if you show up with kids at a soup kitchen, they have to call children's services on you. And?? If you can't provide for you or your family that's what children's services are for..to help you to do just that even if that means that your children need to be placed elsewhere until you get back on your feet. Ya know not all government services are out to pull families apart no matter what you may see in the movies or hear on the news. My intent with my first post in this thread was to pull this problem away from the dynamic Dom/sub. Even if there is no living together, we can't deny that there is some sort of a relationship. Let's call it 'friends'. I am used to having friends over for dinner. When one of my friends is ill, and will benefit from a cooked meal for the family, the other friends set up a schedule and prepare those meals daily, as long as needed. From reading the OP and additional information that trickled in, is it too much to hope that the one 'friend' has the other 'friend' over for a meal once in a while to lessen the burden? This is what I got from the last post from the OP: quote:
The situation was this... While owned by him and under a promise to take care of my emotional, physical and other need ,i lost my job... we did not live together..yes i get unemployment and of course struggle to pay the bills.. while making sure the bills were met and my children were feed, there just wasnt enough for me..not just that.. i was in fear of my power being shut off and was doing without medicine that i needed. The fact that my doing without those things and him doing nothing to assit made me feel unsafe and unprotected... Red: There is money coming in, but it's not enough. Hopefully this situation changes soon. My friends would actually be upset with me if they would find out later that I struggled like this and didn't tell them. Isn't helping each other out an important part of being human? Blue: Does the fact that these 2 people don't live together make the 'being owned and that promise' invalid? Or is it that in hard times you get to know who your real friends are? I brought up children's services to show that even if the OP is being smart with money but still can't make ends meet, a soup kitchen is not an option for her. It would be if she had no kids. And let's forget the idea that children's services have foster parents growing like a forest. They don't. If they did, every child in poverty would be placed elsewhere. And again, my friends would never find it acceptable for me to have to go to a soup kitchen. Maybe I am just very lucky. I don't quite understand how your last sentence relates to the 2nd last. To me they go in opposite directions. To me it seems that the dynamic of the OP has fallen apart (this should include the sexual component as well). I can understand that losing this during hard times is disappointing for her.
< Message edited by happylittlepet -- 8/30/2009 6:27:15 PM >
|