CaringandReal
Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP quote:
ORIGINAL: NihilusZero I'm having trouble seeing how the willingness to have a demeanor that would always bring a smile to your D-type's/partner's face could be warped into attempting to "control his moods". Because I can't always bring a smile to his face. So if I feel that my responsibility is to make him happy, no matter what, I'm ignoring the realities of life and I'll put myself in a tailspin when, for whatever reason, he simply won't get a smile on his face. I do my best but I don't beat myself up about it if he isn't pleased. And if the D type isn't pleased, then by definition the s type wasn't pleasing. No matter if a week before the very same behavior would have had him howling with desire. "If the D type isn't pleased, then by definition the s type wasn't pleasing." That's where I'm having have the disconnect. My thinking about this is, "If my dominant isn't pleased, then by definition he isn't pleased." I don't think I take the next step in my thinking to the "therefore I wasn't pleasing" part. A means only A to me, it does not mean B. So if he is not pleased, I might wonder if it was me, but then not worry much about it. As they said in Little Big Man, "Sometimes the magic works... and sometimes it doesn't." But that wouldn't stop me from trying again and very quickly to make (manipulate, unsneaky version) him feel happy or some other positive emotion. What would stop me from trying again is if I blamed myself for his not being pleased. But I couldn't blame myself for that unless I felt I could/should control him. Maybe it is all just mental games, but I think that precisely because I don't feel in control around someone I acknolwedge as my dominant, I am free to do things, to take risks that might crush me if they were performed with the expectation that "I am in control of this, therefore if I don't get the expected result, it's my fault and I am a failure/loser." If I can't please, it just means he wasn't in the mood, usually. (Granted, some dominants are moodier than others. With that type, pleasing becomes a matter of learning the shifting winds and the currents and how to appropriately respond to each.) This belief (that a dominant's not being pleased has little or nothing to do with me) is held not just because I don't feel in control of him and therefore am not particularly surprised when I don't get an expected result, but also because I believe he would tell me if I, specifically, was displeasing, maybe not instantly (see moody doms, above) but eventually, if that were the case. That's part of the whole "clear communication" and "transparancy" deal, isn't it? I might explore further, in the desire to find out more about him, why he wasn't in the mood for whatever it was I did, but that would depend ont he circumstances. If he had a hacking cough, was shivering uncontrollably, and running a high fever, even I could probably, with a little luck, figure it out on my own. The above stance is not my original one, and I don't think it's the natural starting point for most of us. It was something I was taught, and then later continued to explore on my own.
|