MaamJay
Posts: 2101
Joined: 9/2/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pinnipedster It seems to me that the best compromise arrangement would be one where the lady and I thoroughly discussed our respective fantasies ahead of time; but that once she took control, that was it. I do want to get some of my fantasies fulfilled, or I wouldn't be here. But letting her decide exactly when, where, and how is not only acceptable -- it's kind of part of the fantasy in the first place. pinnipedster ... that would make you the kind of CD sub I WOULD be prepared to take on, even after feeling "burned" by My CD ex. he was NEVER willing to let Me control the expression of his fetish ... qed, he didn't really submit, and that quickly infiltrated most other aspects of his "submission". From what you have said, CDing is a much desired part of your overall submission BUT you are willing to hand over the control of the expression of that outlet to your Dominant. Now She'd be silly if She didn't realise that if She totally banned you from CDing She'd have a very unhappy boy who wasn't getting his stated needs met in the relationship. So your "perfect match" is a woman who enjoys seeing Her boy dressed, is willing to push his boundaries a bit in terms of when, where and how but who knows She will still have his loyalty and obedience on those occasions when She does say "Not tonight josephine, I want you to be joe!" I do prefer the term "enforced feminization" a LOT over "forced X-dressing" for all the reasons in this thread. It allows the Dominant to be "The Enforcer" (looks for Clint Eastwood over Her shoulder LOL!) I do agree that this has been a great thread on this topic, and to Priscilla, thanks for the apology and no worries, I realise My names are a bit confusing so I never take offence, only try to clarify. Maam Jay aka violet[A]
_____________________________
Life is a song ... and I love singing it! (By me!)
|