tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
I did Master Tim. would not either argument fall into the following? The argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam ("appeal to ignorance" [1]), argument by lack of imagination, or negative evidence, is a logical fallacy in which it is claimed that a premise is true only because it has not been proven false, or is false only because it has not been proven true. The argument from personal incredulity, also known as argument from personal belief or argument from personal conviction, refers to an assertion that because one personally finds a premise unlikely or unbelievable, the premise can be assumed to be false, or alternatively that another preferred but unproven premise is true instead. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance "or is false only because it has not been proven true" this is saying to me that because Religion cannot prove beyond a doubt that god exists, then he doesnt exist. which is a fallacy, according to this definition. i didnt ask either side to prove or disprove. i merely said that until one can, there is that grey area. This may help as well. http://www.scottmsullivan.com/articles/burden.pdf
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|