MadameMarque -> RE: Is Atheism a religion? (9/7/2009 6:34:28 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Now, if legally those who don't adopt a faith find their rights are inhibited, then legally, they become a class. But not a religion. Now, isn't that what I said, if you hadn't conveniently clipped it out of my quote?: quote:
ORIGINAL: MadameMarque quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl According to the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and Supreme Court Rulings.... It is, legally, a religion. Without actually reading the decision, I'm going to venture that they were upholding the right of atheists to be protected by laws and constitutional rights using the term "religion," because although atheism isn't a religion, it is a "religious belief," a belief regarding religion, so that in the spirit of the law, the same laws are intended to protect the rights of atheists and agnostics. quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote:
ORIGINAL: MadameMarque I understand that atheists do not feel that theirs is a faith-based cosmology, because they depend upon what can be detected by the senses to determine what is true and real. To me, it seems to be based upon complete faith in the senses and the material world as the ultimate and true last word on a finite reality. Then you make giant assumptions. Not everyone believes they know everything. Scientists certainly don't. You leave no room for learning, for not knowing. Wouldn't that be agnosticism you're talking about? I thought that atheism was the belief that there is no diety, and agnoticism was holding no belief regarding diety, 'a-gnosis.' I don't know how I implied that there was someone who thinks they know everything - ? quote:
Original: Musicmystery Again, what's presented here is the faithful needing to label the Others. The label is meaningless but to the faithful. I've got no "need" - I don't really relate to what you're trying to say, here, except that it seems you make some assumption. If you assume I'm coming from the construct that atheism or agnoticism are less valid than other beliefs or absence of belief, you are mistaken. I will observe that you are fond of labeling "the faithful" as a group, lumping them together and characterizing them. So I'm not sure why you're so touchy, when someone even refers to atheists as a group of people. Yeah, they're the group of people who are atheists, that's all. If someone makes careless or incorrect generalizations about them, then you'd have something to complain about.
|
|
|
|