Musicmystery -> RE: Is Atheism a religion? (9/7/2009 7:00:44 AM)
|
~FR~ OK, atheist = religion folks. If that's the cause, then nonfaith groups should be eligible when money is passed out for faith-based initiatives. It's a religion under the law and all. But if you're ever in the mood for some critical thinking--your position also maintains that it's impossible not to have a religion, as not having one is one. The negative is the positive. Nonbelief is belief. And any who question you are illogical by your logic. It's the worst reasoning since Sigmund Freud maintained that if you doubted his theories about denial, it just proved his theories, because you were in denial about his theories. All very convenient. All good argument, all good science, is the beginning of the conversation--it provides rich ground on which to build further understanding and argument and science. Poor reasoning goes in circles, has the answers all solved, shuts down the conversation, because things just are, neatly wrapped up. There's a god. Solved. Those who have no god have their own nongod religion. Whew....also solved. Life is simple. Hallelujah! The legal bullshit--on both sides--is just one more reason why separation of church and state is so important, as the founders of my country set if up, and as my countrymen used to believe. Oops....there's that word again. Should that be my religion? At least it's something I actually firmly, passionately, actively believe. Or perhaps that's part of the problem...people have become so passive they confuse it with active. Well, you're gonna call nonbelief a belief no matter what anyone presents, you always were, so disavowing you of that assumption/conclusion is futile. Perhaps you can at least consider the implications and ramifications of what you're claiming. Well, I'm off to practice my religion...oh, wait....how do I practice something I don't do? [8|]
|
|
|
|