tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LanceHughes tazzygirl: Go read the brief. It's not too hard. My blood boils when people do not argue or discuss fairly. Your blood should too. In summary, a prison group wanted to form a "study group" for atheism since that's how prisons get around the 1st amendment clause prohibiting the establihment of a religion. That is, the Catholic study group "studies" Catholism by holding Mass. You see, if the prison gave space/time/services to Catholics directly, then they would be establishing a religion within the prison walls at taxpayers' expense - obviously a no-no. Other side of the coin: deny Mass to many in prison and see where that gets you. So, the atheists wanted a study group, and were denied because they were NOT a religion. As a side note: I did belong to the local (Denver) chapter of Society of Separationists (Madyn Murray O'Hair's group.) We met every Sunday, religiously. I have some of her books autographed by her when the SOS had their national convention here (on Easter, of course.) I could look up the year, if you care to know it. my blood doesnt boil in a debate... i would lose perspective. i have read the brief... and posted the source, which you overlooked in your boiling state of anger. i asked simple, concise questions. i have no problem with any group being allowed the same rights as anyone else. if a smoker gets breaks, non smokers should too. i dont believe kids should have to use god in an oath... god isnt a requirement to be a good citizen. what bothered me about all this is how there are atheists who insist that they believe in nothing, have no formal belief in anything religious, yet seek protection using that same term that abhor (sp) so much. i dont believe in discrimination, on any level... i also dont believe in hypocracy on any level either. "Without venturing too far into the realm of the philosophical, we have suggested in the past that when a person sincerely holds beliefs dealing with issues of 'ultimate concern' that for her occupy a 'place parallel to that filled by . . . God in traditionally religious persons,' those beliefs represent her religion." "We have already indicated that atheism may be considered, in this specialized sense, a religion. See Reed v. Great Lakes Cos., 330 F.3d 931, 934 (7th Cir. 2003) ('If we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion.')" Be More Specific: The ruling we've been discussing was with regard to a prisoner (James J. Kaufman) who claimed that his First Amendment rights were violated when the warden refused to allow him to form a group of inmates to study and discuss atheism. Specifically, he cited the Free Exercise clause and the Establishment clause. The court, recognizing that the defendant "utterly failed" to demonstrate that his freedom to exercise his beliefs had been infringed, shot down the Free Exercise claim - and rightly so. Despite the Court's reference to an atheist "code of ethics", it should be noted that atheism has only one requirement which would qualify under the Free Exercise clause - disbelief. Atheism isn't a religion in the conventional sense and there are no rituals associated with it. In order to violate an atheist's right to freely exercise their beliefs, you'd have to be able to reprogram someone's mind. In a nutshell, Mr. Kaufman was just as free to exercise his lack of belief alone in his cell. As a prisoner he isn't necessarily afforded all of the other rights guaranteed to citizens of the United States. The right to speak freely and peaceably assemble, which atheists might choose to exercise, don't always apply to a prisoner. http://www.atheist-community.org/library/articles/read.php?id=742 there is more, as i am sure you are aware.... but Master is calling me to bed... till tomorrow... good night
< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 9/7/2009 8:43:05 PM >
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|