Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 9:51:03 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy


...yes.

However, it's an easy mistake to make. When one's 'side' is in power then one is generally less angry than when they're in opposition. What you're noticing is only a relative amount of anger, not an absolute one. When the Republicans were in power, then Democrats were just as angry as Republicans are now.


Do you really find that to be true?

I'm not sure how much coverage of our news you get there, but it seems to me, from an admittedly partisan perspective, that much of the current anger is being manufactured by conservative media sources and those who stand to benefit financially by seeing certain programs such as health care reform defeated.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:13:25 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Spinner, before Obama got elected, did you ask why the liberals were so mad.? If you did I guess I missed it.


While not directed to me I hope you don't mind if I interject.

A war fought on the pretense of destroying a country's WMD's, which they did not have, would be a good place to start.

A war that has seen 4300 Americans killed and over 30,000 injured.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:15:05 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy


...yes.

However, it's an easy mistake to make. When one's 'side' is in power then one is generally less angry than when they're in opposition. What you're noticing is only a relative amount of anger, not an absolute one. When the Republicans were in power, then Democrats were just as angry as Republicans are now.


Do you really find that to be true?

I'm not sure how much coverage of our news you get there, but it seems to me, from an admittedly partisan perspective, that much of the current anger is being manufactured by conservative media sources and those who stand to benefit financially by seeing certain programs such as health care reform defeated.



.....a lot of that is true. This is the right wing base, getting organised, looking for opportunities to take a shot and not being too fussy if it's cheap or not. However, while i think there is much to criticise the previous administration for, the left wing base treated them exactly the same.
Not every criticism of Bush was justified. Not every criticism of Obama is justified. However partisan politics have become so entrenched that to the opposite side every shot is justified.
A third party in US politics would be a welcome change.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:21:47 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
While I agree with the last sentence, you will have to convince me of the rest.

Yes, the left wing base did go after Bush, but for issues that had merit.

What we have heard so far in the attacks on Obama is his supposed lack of citizenship, his supposed ties with "radicals", and his secret plan to turn the country into a socialist police state.






< Message edited by rulemylife -- 9/13/2009 10:22:33 PM >

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:22:20 PM   
shannie


Posts: 200
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
I'm not sure how much coverage of our news you get there, but it seems to me, from an admittedly partisan perspective, that much of the current anger is being manufactured by conservative media sources and those who stand to benefit financially by seeing certain programs such as health care reform defeated.


Anger isn't manufactured.  It's directed.  And if people weren't being oppressed, there would be nothing to direct. And the media isn't "conservative" (or "liberal") -- it's 100% corporate.

And who stands to benefit if "health care reform" is defeated?  Insurance company lobbyists were at the White House in droves lobbying FOR the so-called "health care reform." They are against the public option (which was never truly on the table), but FOR the very heart of this whole thing -- which is to force us all to buy corporate health insurance. 

Look, the power-that-be have spent the last 20-30 years deconstructing/limiting the safety net (benefits for the mothers of young children, the elderly, the disabled). Did anyone really think "free health care for all" was on the the table?  It never was. 

People are angry for good reason.  The corporate media is convincing you (falsely!) that the entire American populace is divided into two teams -- so that we can fight/mock each other, instead of the crooks/pirates who are raping and pillaging our country.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:32:32 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Yes, the left wing base did go after Bush, but for issues that had merit.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_military_service_controversy

.....this one didn't, eh?

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:51:00 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: shannie

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
I'm not sure how much coverage of our news you get there, but it seems to me, from an admittedly partisan perspective, that much of the current anger is being manufactured by conservative media sources and those who stand to benefit financially by seeing certain programs such as health care reform defeated.


Anger isn't manufactured.  It's directed.  And if people weren't being oppressed, there would be nothing to direct. And the media isn't "conservative" (or "liberal") -- it's 100% corporate.


Does Rupert Murdoch have an agenda? 

quote:


And who stands to benefit if "health care reform" is defeated?  Insurance company lobbyists were at the White House in droves lobbying FOR the so-called "health care reform." They are against the public option (which was never truly on the table), but FOR the very heart of this whole thing -- which is to force us all to buy corporate health insurance.


We will have to wait and see if that is the truth.

But the reality is the uninsured are a drain on the whole health care system and, while I don't like the idea of government mandating a requirement like this, it will lower overall health care costs, which is why the insurance companies are supporting it. 

quote:



Look, the power-that-be have spent the last 20-30 years deconstructing/limiting the safety net (benefits for the mothers of young children, the elderly, the disabled). Did anyone really think "free health care for all" was on the the table?  It never was. 

People are angry for good reason.  The corporate media is convincing you (falsely!) that the entire American populace is divided into two teams -- so that we can fight/mock each other, instead of the crooks/pirates who are raping and pillaging our country.



So you think people are just angry at the government in general?

I think you need to look at the news reports of the town hall meetings and the protest in DC and then tune into Beck, Hannity, and Limbaugh to see the anger and where it is really coming from.

The "powers that be" put that safety net in place.

Matbe you should look into who is, and has been, trying to deconstruct it.

(in reply to shannie)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:51:31 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Yes, the left wing base did go after Bush, but for issues that had merit.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_military_service_controversy

.....this one didn't, eh?

It didn't? The fact that the POTUS was a criminal had no merit?

Perhaps you don't understand how serious the issue is. GWB was, at the very least, UA (unauthorized absence), in violation of a direct order and derelict in his duty. Those are 3 very serious crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and in most other cases would have resulted in a commissioned officer being court martialed and very likely receiving a prison sentence.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:57:44 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

Just to understand this, Firm, you are again claiming that it is all the "left leaning statists" fault and if currently certain republicans are doing the very things you claim wrong from the left it is ok to do so because it is a response? For example: If someone says things in his posts that he admits are lies, that is a justifiable thing because the left did it previously? Or are you saying that the left was correct in employing these tactics and now the right has seen that they were correct and adopted them? Or is it your point that the republicans are incapable in making their point in any better manner than the democrats (pardon me, left leaning statists) and so must now sink to the level of lies, demonization and shouting you claim they inflicted on the country? Perhaps you are saying that it's wrong when the left did these things but ok for the republicans because they didn't start it?

Please, do make yourself clear on this issue.


It's clear enough. Not all "liberals" or "progressives" or whatever the hell your sides name is today are shiftless, lowlife scumbags. Only most of the ones in power. (I'm sarcastically channeling Mars now, in case you miss the sarcasm).

All conservatives, all republicans, all people who believe in God (well, Jesus), who believe that government can't solve all of our problems are obviously stupid, criminal, dupes of the greedy capitalist, uneducated, unwashed and perhaps mentally damaged people. They either lie about everything, or they are being lied to, and are dumb enough to believe it.

If they don't believe that the government should control the medical establishment, they are obviously heartless bastards (or they are paid protesters of the Greedy Insurance Companies. Or their dupes.). And they lie.

If they don't believe that sucking malignant growths out of a woman's body (which would eventually, after 9 months, turn into a human being), then they obviously are Religious Fanatics only interested in enslaving women, and keeping them barefoot and uneducated, and cooking in the kitchen. And they lie.

If they dare to speak out against Obama, Reid, or Pelosi, then they are "nazis", "astroturfers", "teabagging idiots" or "unAmerican". They are shills for the "far right wing" (or at least they didn't register Democrat in the last election cycle). Did I mention liars, too?

If they question "Global Warming" (whoops, what is it today? Climate Change? World Heater Day?),. then they are uneducated, unscientific, criminals, traitors to the earth or dupes of the Big Oil Companies.

If they believe that there are people in the world who have an agenda and desire to kill Americans, and that a legitimate defense is to kill them first ... then they are heartless, cruel, war-mongering dupes of the Military Industrial Complex (or at least Haliburton). And they lie. Did I mention that yet?

If they believe that free markets have provided more freedom, and more safety, more food, and saved more lives than any other system in human history ... then they are doubtlessly either shills for Greedy Capitalist, paid lobbyist for the same, criminals, or ... dupes without enough intelligence to know that they are fighting against their own interests.

If they believe that the US Constitution's 2nd amendment right to bear arms shouldn't be interfered with, then they are obviously vile "wing nuts", "gun nuts", "crazy right wing militia" members. They are especially stupid because they can't seem to find the "right to an abortion" or see the Constitution's "fatal flaw" because it doesn't address the (obviously needed) right to redistribute other people's wealth to the correctly thinking left wing political supporters.

Any of this sound familiar yet? I got tons of 'em.

Most of all ... they are liars.

Yeah, that seems to be the most common refrain. Here on CM, if you are a "twue liberal" (progressive, whatever), then you must use the word "lie" and "liar" at least once every two threads, or you are in danger of having your license revoked.

So how does anyone on the right engage in "constructive debate" with people who act and speak about their rhetorical opponents thusly?

I've come to the conclusion that it's a waste of time to attempt to engage them rationally, and expect any acknowledgment of good faith disagreement or with the understanding that people of good faith can disagree. I don't think I'm the only one.

Clear enough?

If you don't fit the category of the people who attempt to "debate" in the manner that I mention above, then I'm not talking about "you" (the generic "you"). There are some "liberals" who still have the ability to discuss and agree to disagree without attempting to paint their political and rhetoric opponent as worthless human scumbags who lie as a matter of course. Two notable ones who are currently active are philosophy and Arpig. A few others try, occasionally, but their natural propensity to reach for the (stupid, criminal, dupe) button almost always reveal what they really think.

Should "the right" continue to attempt to debate "ideas", when they are treated as nothing more than scum that should be wiped off the feet before entering polite company? When they don't have the power to enforce by law their beliefs ... they are tolerable. Barely.

When they become the law?

It's not "ok" for the right to return the favor. It is, however, perhaps the only remaining path.

Exigent circumstances.

Once we've cleared the poison from our system, then we can attempt to return to honest debate and discussion. If that is possible.

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to SpinnerofTales)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:58:48 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy
the left wing base treated them exactly the same.

Got to say that isn't even close to true.

Death threats against Obama are up 400% compared to GWB.
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2009/08/cnns_rick_sanchez_dissects_ste.php

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 10:59:39 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Yes, the left wing base did go after Bush, but for issues that had merit.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_military_service_controversy

.....this one didn't, eh?


Yes, it did.

You had a candidate who was vocal in support of the Vietnam War while he used his father's and grandfather's political connections to avoid that very war.

Who then went on to start his own ill-conceived war that got many others killed and injured.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:06:09 PM   
shannie


Posts: 200
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
But the reality is the uninsured are a drain on the whole health care system and, while I don't like the idea of government mandating a requirement like this, it will lower overall health care costs, which is why the insurance companies are supporting it. 


How will it lower health care costs?  If there is no "maximum profit" (cap) for the health insurance companies, it will simply rise to the top in increased profits. Insurance companies support it for that very reason.

Did you see Roger Moore's "Sicko?"  It wasn't about the "uninsured."  It was about the absolute corruption and inefficiency of the corporate insurance industry. And if that industry had no reason to be competitive before (and to create a product we would buy because it was beneficial and cost effective to us), they will have far less reason to be competitive now.

And in the meantime, those of us who preferred to pay for routine medical costs out-of-pocket, will be forced to pay thousands of dollars in corporate insurance premiums (and all of the invasion of privacy that it entails) -- for no benefit to anyone but the corrupt, inefficient corporate insurance industry.


(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:21:52 PM   
shannie


Posts: 200
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
The "powers that be" put that safety net in place.
Maybe you should look into who is, and has been, trying to deconstruct it.


Clinton spearheaded the whole "welfare reform" thing.  Is it credible to believe they would take a subsistence subsidy away from single mothers, or deny essential medical supplies to the disabled (see below), but suddenly purport to give us ALL free healthcare?  No, it's not credible.  They have us all debating on the terms they've fed us ("Is free health care good or bad?"), but what they really intend to do is force us to buy corporate health insurance. 

http://www.medicaldaily.net/link.asp?ID=65953&Title=MEDICARE+challenged+on+catheters

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:23:50 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Yes, the left wing base did go after Bush, but for issues that had merit.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_military_service_controversy

.....this one didn't, eh?


Yes, it did.

You had a candidate who was vocal in support of the Vietnam War while he used his father's and grandfather's political connections to avoid that very war.

Who then went on to start his own ill-conceived war that got many others killed and injured.


hmmm .... an ethical dilemma ...

Should I call you a liar, or just prove you wrong?

Or should I say that you base your comments and beliefs on a lie ... but that you're comfortable with that?

Page 130 of the "The Complete Independent Panel Report on CBS News" (pdf file)

The clear inference from this excerpt is that President Bush was in the TexANG to avoid service in Vietnam. Bush did state in his 1968 TexANG application that he did not volunteer to go overseas. However, Mapes had information prior to the airing of the September 8 Segment that President Bush, while in the TexANG, did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned down in favor of more experienced pilots.72 For example, a flight instructor who served in the TexANG with Lieutenant Bush advised Mapes in 1999 that Lieutenant Bush “did want to go to Vietnam but others went first.” Similarly, several others advised Mapes in 1999, and again in 2004 before September 8, that Lieutenant Bush had volunteered to go to Vietnam but did not have enough flight hours to qualify.


Does anyone on the right believe that there is a chance in hell that you'll admit you are wrong, and change your claim?

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:24:01 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
Firm, "the right" spent the last 8 years digging the hole they now find themselves in - 8 years of earning every goddamned shred of the anger, disgust, and lack of respect of which they now find themselves the targets. From looting the treasury and totally trashing the world economy to line their own pockets, to treating the constitution like a piece of toilet paper stuck to the bottom of their collective shoe, to running up bazillions of dollars worth of debt to finance a war of aggression they lied us into, to slandering and maligning the patriotism of anyone who even questioned (much less opposed) their every action, to... well, I could type all night, but you get the point.

And now you're crying like little girls because people aren't being nice to you? Tough shit. Cry me a fucking river. The piper's at the door with his invoice in hand, and you people who supported and enabled Bush get absolutely no sympathy from me. Zero.

Live with it, if I may borrow a phrase from you. Spare us all the "oh, why can't we put the partisanship aside and be nice to each other" crap. You and your ilk had no interest whatsoever in "returning to honest debate and discussion" when you were busily fucking up the entire country for generations to come, so don't expect most of us to pay any attention to your whining now that you no longer have the imperial power you enjoyed for most of President Adolph Gump's Reign of Error. As far as I'm concerned, the republican party is "nothing more than scum that should be wiped off the feet before entering polite company", as you so candidly put it. If that's the way you people now find yourself being treated, you have nobody to blame but yourselves. 

_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:32:53 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy
the left wing base treated them exactly the same.

Got to say that isn't even close to true.

Death threats against Obama are up 400% compared to GWB.
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2009/08/cnns_rick_sanchez_dissects_ste.php


Here is the actual quote:

Sanchez cited "a CNN source with very close ties to the U.S. Secret Service," who informed him that, "threats on the life of the President of the United States have now risen by as much as 400 percent since his inauguration," and that this goes, "far beyond anything the Secret Service has seen with any other president."


Yeah ... reliable sources .... an anonymous CNN source ... I bet it's the hairdress's friend, who runs a dry cleaner, who once had a maid who once thought about giving a BJ to a friend who once dated a secretly gay man, who told her than he worked for the CIA during Vietnam, but was lately working on getting into a counterfeiting ring so that he could help his brother Barney who wanted a job at the Secret Service ... if only they would ignore his drug trafficking charge in 1996 ...

He did have an interview with the SS, once, after all ...

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:47:07 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

Firm, "the right" spent the last 8 years digging the hole they now find themselves in - 8 years of earning every goddamned shred of the anger, disgust, and lack of respect of which they now find themselves the targets. From looting the treasury and totally trashing the world economy to line their own pockets, to treating the constitution like a piece of toilet paper stuck to the bottom of their collective shoe, to running up bazillions of dollars worth of debt to finance a war of aggression they lied us into, to slandering and maligning the patriotism of anyone who even questioned (much less opposed) their every action, to... well, I could type all night, but you get the point.

And now you're crying like little girls because people aren't being nice to you? Tough shit. Cry me a fucking river. The piper's at the door with his invoice in hand, and you people who supported and enabled Bush get absolutely no sympathy from me. Zero.

Live with it, if I may borrow a phrase from you. Spare us all the "oh, why can't we put the partisanship aside and be nice to each other" crap. You and your ilk had no interest whatsoever in "returning to honest debate and discussion" when you were busily fucking up the entire country for generations to come, so don't expect most of us to pay any attention to your whining now that you no longer have the imperial power you enjoyed for most of President Adolph Gump's Reign of Error. As far as I'm concerned, the republican party is "nothing more than scum that should be wiped off the feet before entering polite company", as you so candidly put it. If that's the way you people now find yourself being treated, you have nobody to blame but yourselves. 




Got it.

Although, I think you mistake prognostication for "whining".

I'd be whining if I had any expectation that your side could, or would be able to do or be anything else, other than what it now is.

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:47:20 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: shannie


How will it lower health care costs?  If there is no "maximum profit" (cap) for the health insurance companies, it will simply rise to the top in increased profits. Insurance companies support it for that very reason.

Did you see Roger Moore's "Sicko?"  It wasn't about the "uninsured."  It was about the absolute corruption and inefficiency of the corporate insurance industry. And if that industry had no reason to be competitive before (and to create a product we would buy because it was beneficial and cost effective to us), they will have far less reason to be competitive now.

And in the meantime, those of us who preferred to pay for routine medical costs out-of-pocket, will be forced to pay thousands of dollars in corporate insurance premiums (and all of the invasion of privacy that it entails) -- for no benefit to anyone but the corrupt, inefficient corporate insurance industry.




To begin with, we don't even have a health care bill ready to be put to a vote, so this arguing about what it does or does not contain is pointless.

And, while you may prefer to pay your routine medical costs out-of-pocket, what happens if your medical costs go beyond the routine?

Do you have the necessary funds to self-insure or will those costs be passed on to others?

(in reply to shannie)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/13/2009 11:53:52 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: shannie



Clinton spearheaded the whole "welfare reform" thing.  Is it credible to believe they would take a subsistence subsidy away from single mothers, or deny essential medical supplies to the disabled (see below), but suddenly purport to give us ALL free healthcare?  No, it's not credible.  They have us all debating on the terms they've fed us ("Is free health care good or bad?"), but what they really intend to do is force us to buy corporate health insurance. 

http://www.medicaldaily.net/link.asp?ID=65953&Title=MEDICARE+challenged+on+catheters



Uh, I'm a little confused.

Your argument is about the government forcing us to buy corporate health insurance while your link is about a government health program.

(in reply to shannie)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? - 9/14/2009 12:27:33 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
searching for better proof


< Message edited by rulemylife -- 9/14/2009 12:37:36 AM >

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: What Are the Conservatives So Mad At? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.113