cash Masters???

cash Masters??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master

Message

fifteenhoursaday -> cash Masters??? (9/13/2009 9:12:02 PM)
does anyone know a good site for cash $$$ Masters? thanks

DarkSteven -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/13/2009 9:22:26 PM)
Okay. I interpret your post as asking for sites where you can either get Dommed online by a man, or get a directory of male pro Doms. Is that it?

fifteenhoursaday -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/13/2009 9:45:49 PM)
just a website for Masters interested in recieving monetary tribute. not being dommed online, nor a list of professional doms. Thank you so much for clarifying this. :-)

CalifChick -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/13/2009 9:48:42 PM)
If you're giving money away, I can be a master. Seriously. Cali

DemonKia -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/13/2009 10:24:15 PM)
FR, after read thru Tribute? Financial maledoms? Huh. I'm kinda trippin' at the very notion . . . . . . & before knickers get too terribly twisted, it's mostly cuz, while I believe that women should be a more developed market for sexual products & services, I know that they're not . . . . . & they tend to have less money than guys, given the wage-disparity issues . . . . . By all means, if such exist, I'd like to hear about 'em . . . . .

BOUNTYHUNTER -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/13/2009 10:27:52 PM)
I have cash slaves and there is several sites, one is call Cash Masters but you get what you pay for..There are many out there that wish to serve and by tribute is the only way they can..Bounty

IronBear -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/13/2009 10:42:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fifteenhoursaday just a website for Masters interested in recieving monetary tribute. not being dommed online, nor a list of professional doms. Thank you so much for clarifying this. :-) ] Masters receiving money for tribute makes them pro Doms in my book and you'd have to nit pick semantics to separate things you do a job for money you are a professional in that job.... I think you may be looking for a site to find Dom who are prepared to accept some sort of tribute but do not expect it. Sounds like the house wives who advertise sex and expect to be paid in cash or kind and don't consider themselves hookers.

Chimortis -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 8:14:25 AM)
I wouldn't call it the same as pro Dom'ing. Simply receiving money without performing a service, as seems to be the topic of discussion here, would not qualify as far as groups like SWOP are concerned, either. Honestly, I certainly wouldn't be opposed to money for nothin'. ;)

ElaineSubmits -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 8:19:06 AM)
I've always felt that women had a lot more common sense than men. The absence of male "cash masters", for that matter, the general absence of male commercial "doms" for women, is just one more confirmation.

DemonKia -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 8:42:18 AM)
Very cool, Bounty. Thanks for sharing . . . .. Given how significant money is in our culture, how much 'emotional magic' is attached to it (above & beyond its utility in facilitating transactions), financial domination & collection of tribute strike me as being fairly significant displays of power dynamics . . . . . Which is also part of why this subject can be so 'hot', I suspect . . . . . . quote: ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER I have cash slaves and there is several sites, one is call Cash Masters but you get what you pay for..There are many out there that wish to serve and by tribute is the only way they can..Bounty

Chimortis -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 8:51:17 AM)
ElaineSubmits, professional male Domination services are not particularly common, but they do exist. Many larger escort services in large cities which offer male escorts also offer this service both for male and female clients. I have friends involved in a group called SWOP, so I know a number of people in the legitimate sex work industry. It definitely does exist. Furthermore, I would strongly disagree with the assessment that women have more common sense than men. That's akin to saying that white people are less violent than black people.

Musicmystery -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 9:02:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fifteenhoursaday just a website for Masters interested in recieving monetary tribute. not being dommed online, nor a list of professional doms. Thank you so much for clarifying this. :-) A host of books and audiobook compilations will be happy to take your money while you indulge in this fantasy. Sorry bud. They aren't gonna just fall at your feet, and they aren't going to pay you for it either.

ElaineSubmits -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 9:04:55 AM)
Most persons would likely say that "legitimate sex work industry" is a contradiction in terms, but that would likely be a whole separate discussion in itself. I've no doubt that there are women who are silly enough to pay for "domination", of whatever sort, or for other sexual services. There may even be a few who are silly enough to pay for nothing except getting to pay. Men do so far more commonly and readily, by everyone's account, even your own. That would seem to be prima facie evidence of superior female rationality. As far as White people being less violent than Black, the relevance of that point is unclear to me. Anyway, all the historical evidence would point in the opposite direction.

Chimortis -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 9:28:12 AM)
ElaineSubmits, I'm not sure that I follow your logic. If someone happens to enjoy paying for a given service, you classify them as less rational because they follow their desires to do so? Is that what you're saying? By that logic, you could also claim that people who participate in BDSM in any manner are less rational, since it falls outside of society's norms. What do you feel gives you the right to judge such people as more or less rational based upon their particular fetishes? Furthermore, if "most people" would say that legitimate sex work industry is a contradiction in terms, I suppose they have their own worthless prejudices to get over. Consentual acts between adults are not their business, whether there is a financial transaction involved or not. :)

ElaineSubmits -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 9:38:31 AM)
A reasonable person doesn't pay for "services" that are available for free. An emotionally and mentally healthy person does not view intimate personal relationships with others in terms of a commercial service. As for as the legitimacy of prostitution and other forms of sex for hire, you may say what will. Our society as a whole has come to other conclusions. Whatever pseudo-libertarian rationales you have to offer, prostitution remains what it has always been, a way for men to exercise power and control over women's bodies. If the lads in blue should nab you in the act of soliciting, let us all know how well your "consentual acts" (sic) line goes over with your local district court judge.

Chimortis -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 9:50:31 AM)
There's little more to be said here that doesn't involve degenerating into a flame war, other than that I very strongly disagree with your assertions. If we are to cow-tow to "societal norms", we should absolutely not engage in exactly the sort of things that this website was designed to facilitate. By nature, folks in the BDSM community are outside of societal norms, often in more ways than just BDSM (from tabletop RPG gamers to people with three-digit IQs, and people with non-traditional religious beliefs) By acquiescing to societal standards as you would have us do, we give up what makes us unique. Some people enjoy paying for a given service. I do not believe that their having that fetish makes them less rational in any manner. We all have our own set of fetishes, and I would no sooner judge you based on yours than I would those people, as you have done here. As for society as a whole, I must strongly disagree with that statement. Such laws are based on antiquated ultra-right-wing Christo-fascist authoritarian governments and the laws they have chosen to impose - which, in many cases around the country, also outlaw homosexuality. In many places, laws against homosexuality have been removed, and as we move forward, I believe that laws against legitimate sex work will also gradually go away as well (as they have in some states already, too!) Society must progress past outdated notions of morality and stop legislating such morality to continue to progress. I believe it will do so. Historical fact is on my side (see: legalizing medical marijuana, legalizing gay marriage, bringing an end to sodomy laws, bringing an end to laws against sex work such as in Nevada).

ElaineSubmits -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 10:06:13 AM)
I'm afraid that we have already started to get off topic here, so I'll not try to respond to each point you make. I do feel it's worth disagreeing with the notion that bdsm per se contravenes any generally accepted cultural or moral norms. On the contrary, there is a lot of literary and other evidence that what we now call bdsm has a very long heritage, and it has never been specifically prohibited. Our society has always made a very strong distinction between private, individual acts and public, commercial ones, which are regulated far more stringently. I should think you could see the obvious logical fallacy in your final argument. That certain things have changed is no argument that other things will (or should) change. I think it was H. L. Mencken who said that the US constitution guarantees each American's right to be a fool, and that this is the most carefully cherished of all constitutional rights. I'm no huge fan of Mencken, but he seems to have been onto something there.

Chimortis -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 10:16:34 AM)
I'm afraid that you're factually in error. Prior to the 1970's, most states had sodomy laws on the books which prohibited, among other things, private sexual conduct between consenting adults of a homosexual nature, as well as many acts commonly associated with the BDSM community and even more vanilla than that (Maryland, for example, had a law which prohibited oral sex between a male and a female as well as between homosexual couples, until 1999.) Furthermore, it wasn't until the Lawrence v. Texas decision in 2003 that the majority of states sodomy laws were struck down by the supreme court. That's only 6 years ago. You can read more on the subject here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_laws#State_laws_at_time_of_2003_Supreme_Court_decision

Sunnyfey -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 10:21:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ElaineSubmits snip. On the contrary, there is a lot of literary and other evidence that what we now call bdsm has a very long heritage, and it has never been specifically prohibited. snip Actually BDSM is illegal in most of the united states. One can NEVER consent to assault. And no one can legally own another person. Thus the reason BDSM is illegal. Quite simple actually.

Chimortis -> RE: cash Masters??? (9/14/2009 10:22:44 AM)
It's also worth making the point that sex work has as long a heritage as does BDSM, having been called "the world's oldest profession." There is also plenty of literary and other evidence to support that.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875