Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 10:35:39 AM)

Sanity posted on another thread the following...

quote:

Your idea is single payer, Orion. That's exactly what I was discussing... and partisan politics will always be a part of these discussions. Maybe there's some magical La La land somewhere in which everyone is perfectly nonpartisan and things happen as if by magic, but that's not where we're at. Not even close.

More specifically, your "simple" idea is naive. Medicare is breaking us now, Obama even admits that. And so any efforts at this point towards expanding it to cover everyone is just ludicrous.

Fix medicare first, then we can talk. Show us the cuts, show us the new efficiency. Because all I'm hearing right now are dreams.


http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2809955

I would like to take this thread to discuss what is actually affecting the costs of Medicare/Medicaid/Private Insurance, beyond the politics.

I think there is a huge misconception that people who cannot pay their bills have no effect on the costs.. to both the insurance company, regardless of who it is, and the out of pocket expences.

Here is a tidbit for consideration...

quote:


Q7: Will Medicare pay a hospital’s bad debts for non-Medicare patients who don’t
pay their bills?

A7: No. Medicare does not pay the bad debts of non-Medicare patients.

Q8: Does Medicare provide any special compensation to hospitals that treat a large
number of uninsured patients – especially those hospitals that have to write off a
large number of bills for the uninsured?

A8: Yes. CMS makes payments – significant payments – to hospitals that treat a large
number of low-income and uninsured patients. For example, the Medicare and Medicaid
disproportionate share provisions paid $22 billion to hospitals last year. And under the
rules we explain in Question 9, Medicare pays over $1 billion per year to hospitals for the
bad debts of Medicare patients.

Q9: Can a hospital be reimbursed by Medicare for a Medicare patient’s unpaid
deductibles or coinsurance? Are there special rules for this “bad debt” if the patient
meets the hospital’s indigency guidelines?

A9: Yes. In the case of Medicare patients generally, the program reimburses a hospital
for a percentage of the “bad debt” of a Medicare beneficiary (i.e., unpaid deductibles or
coinsurance) as long as the hospital sends a bill to a patient and engages in reasonable,
consistent collection efforts.
However, if a hospital, using its customary methods, can document that a Medicare
patient is indigent or medically indigent (as we used that term in question 1), the hospital
can then forgo any collection effort aimed at the patient. And, if the hospital also
determines that no source other than the patient is legally responsible for the unpaid
deductibles and coinsurance, the hospital may claim the amounts as Medicare bad debts.
Hospitals may, but are not required to, determine a patient’s indigency using a sliding
scale. In this type of arrangement, the provider would agree to deem the patient indigent
with respect to a portion of the patient’s account (e.g., a flat percentage of the debt based
on the patient’s income, assets, or the size of the patient’s liability relative to their
income). In the case of a Medicare patient that is determined to be indigent using this
method, the amount the hospital decides, pursuant to its policy, not to collect from the
patient can be claimed by the provider as Medicare bad debt. The provider must,
however, engage in a reasonable collection effort to collect the remaining balance


http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/downloads/FAQ_Uninsured.pdf

Each time we visit a Dr or Hospital, we pay a small portion of the bills incurred by those who cannot. By giving all at least minimal insurance, some of this cost will be removed from those who are paying it now, such as Medicare and Private Insurance, and given back to those who now have insurance.

To me, its truly a process of simple mathematics. Medicare and Medicaid are a drain on our system. Remove some of the drain.. and their cost will decrease.




kccuckoldmist -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 1:45:37 PM)

Healthcare costs are paid by the people that still have the money to pay for them. Whether the government pays for them and is paid by taxing those with money, increased insurance premiums passed down to employees and reduced insurance coverage that takes money out of pocket of all that have to see a doctor the costs are coming out of an ever decreasing supply of available money.

The costs have to be controlled to fix the problem the where the money gets sucked dried is the secondary problem.

Hospital costs are always misleading in an inflated way. It does take time and money to treat the uninsured. But there is a difference between an actual real cost and a billed cost and of course all hospitals are only ever going to report the billed cost. The fact is the person that went and visited me in the ER got a test and some pills and left to never pay gets booked as a thousand dollar loss. But the truth was my ten minutes with him did not really cost the hospital anything and the pills were marked up for overhead. Now this is too simplistic as collectively uninsured do add a cost in terms of extra time and therefore pay to people but it is far from a one on one ratio that is reported.

A simpler example might be a person walks into a car dealership and talks to a salesman for an hour and leaves without buying. Did that salesman lose commission or the opportunity of commission from a person wanting to buy or was that person the only one in the dealership at that time and it really cost him nothing. A hospital books everything like a person will pay full cost then those with no insurance or do not pay they show a full loss and not a real loss.




DarkSteven -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 2:19:32 PM)

I am totally lost.

Let's simplify by breaking healthcare costs into three components:' the "actual cost", overheard, and profit.  Then if someone uninsured gets treated, the hospital not get directly reimbursed for those costs but will increase its overhead rates on the insured to cover.

If you buy this model, then the only way to reduce healthcare costs is to either reduce the number of people/visits which get treated, or to somehow force overhead down.

Having the government get into this could easily add more paperwork, which will add to overhead. 




hardbodysub -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 3:38:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

I am totally lost.

Let's simplify by breaking healthcare costs into three components:' the "actual cost", overheard, and profit.  Then if someone uninsured gets treated, the hospital not get directly reimbursed for those costs but will increase its overhead rates on the insured to cover.

If you buy this model, then the only way to reduce healthcare costs is to either reduce the number of people/visits which get treated, or to somehow force overhead down.

Having the government get into this could easily add more paperwork, which will add to overhead. 


I have financial and consulting experience in virtually all segments of the health care industry, from insurers to hospitals and other care providers, and I can say with some pretty good authority that you've got it backwards. The largest component of financial waste is the profit, sales and marketing, and administrative costs of the insurance companies. Where the government is involved in the insurance component (Medicare), administrative costs are about 3% of the total program cost. The rest goes to actual health care provided. However, the profit and administrative costs of the highly-touted free market insurance companies run to over 20% of the premiums, meaning that less than $.80 of every premium dollar is spent on actual care. They spend tons of money on marketing, trying to get as many HEALTHY people on their plans as possible, and on trying to find ways to keep potentially expensive patients OFF their plans. And then they take a big cut of the premiums for hefty executive salaries and profits. Overhead is much less with government administered health insurance. The administrative costs of the health care providers is also increased because of the overwhelming number and variety of insurance companies and plans, each with different requirements and benefits. Cutting the profit motive out of the middle man and simplifying the types of plans is a money saver.

One of the problems in the overall debate is that people are confusing health care with insurance. Providing health care services is one thing, and funding insurance is another. There are some things that can be improved on the health care service side, but right now, the biggest problems, and by far the most vast source of waste, is on the insurance side.




DarkSteven -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 3:42:39 PM)

Hardbodysub, thanks for posting something that I can actually understand about health care costs!




hardbodysub -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 3:43:11 PM)

I think what kccuckoldmist is trying to illustrate is that hospitals are different animals than most business when it comes to finances. It's a weird result of the way insurance has twisted things around in our country. Hospital charges mean virtually nothing. It's a price that the hospital sets that almost nobody pays. Each insurer negotiates its own discount with the hospital (or hospital group), with the richest, most powerful insurance companies getting the best discount. The only people who pay full charge are the ones who can least afford it, those who have no insurance at all. Pretty great job the "free market" has done, isn't it?




hardbodysub -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 3:52:30 PM)

quote:

Medicare is breaking us now, Obama even admits that. And so any efforts at this point towards expanding it to cover everyone is just ludicrous


The quote above misses the mark by a mile. What it fails to recognize is that if our patchwork network of private insurers covered the same people now covered by Medicare, the costs would be significantly higher, in the range of 20% more. Yes, Medicare costs have been increasing. But so are health care costs for the rest of us. Having a Medicare-type program for people now covered by private insurance would actually SAVE a lot of money that could then go toward covering the uninsured, or at least to providing more care instead of funding for-profit insurance company profits and executive bonuses.




Sanity -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 3:52:47 PM)


The mess we have in the current insurance environment isn't due to the free market at all, its due entirely to the current state of federal and state regulations over the insurance industry. There is no free market in this regard at all, it is all very heavily regulated.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:14:54 PM)

Do you know where I can get actual figures for the administrative cost for Palmetto GBA?


quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub


Where the government is involved in the insurance component (Medicare), administrative costs are about 3% of the total program cost. The rest goes to actual health care provided.




Arpig -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:22:50 PM)

I see Sanity, and removing those regulations will do what exactly....I mean other than letting insurance companies deny more people when they actually try to make use of the insurance they paid into for years? And I suppose that the fact that the banking industry self-immolated when deregulated is irrelevant, somehow the insurance companies can be trusted to not follow suit? Deregulation is the last thing needed...now if you want to streamline the regulations, make them standard nationwide, that will help a tiny bit, but it won't address the very root of the problem: All those involved in healthcare, from the insurers to the providers are in it to make money...not to actually help anybody...the system is designed to maximize profits, which can only be done at the expense of actual care.





OrionTheWolf -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:27:23 PM)

If anyonne cares to read it, here is a good report on comparing Medicare and Private Insurance

http://www.cahi.org/cahi_contents/resources/pdf/CAHI_Medicare_Admin_Final_Publication.pdf




Sanity -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:27:42 PM)


Please. Have I said total deregulation?

No, I have not.

Now you feel you must resort to building strawmen...

My biggest complaint in this whole thing is that it can't be discussed honestly. Obama clearly desires to implement single payer, but he will not put it on the table for discussion. And you misrepresent my arguments to the point they're unrecognizable.

Is a little bit of honesty and civility really too much to ask for?






ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:42:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The mess we have in the current insurance environment isn't due to the free market at all, its due entirely to the current state of federal and state regulations over the insurance industry. There is no free market in this regard at all, it is all very heavily regulated.


Can you explain further, in detail?




Aylee -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:44:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The mess we have in the current insurance environment isn't due to the free market at all, its due entirely to the current state of federal and state regulations over the insurance industry. There is no free market in this regard at all, it is all very heavily regulated.


Can you explain further, in detail?



The big one that comes to mind is not allowing health insurance sales across state lines.




Arpig -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:48:21 PM)

If Obama is in fact trying to get single-payer, then good for him, that's the only thing that will actually solve what ails the US healthcare system. And if he doesn't put it on the table...well can you blame him, look at the stink being made of the lame public option he has proposed...you'd think he was setting up worker's and peasants soviets.

As to the inefficiencies in Medicare, you do realize that most of the areas with a lot of waste and fraud are in fact those areas where the work is contracted out to for-profit companies in the healthcare field. So even Medicare is subject to the same profit driven model as private insurance. If you want to fix the system, its easy..get the private insurance companies out of basic coverage...let them insure for the extras, the luxury items, but get them out of basic care period...not as an option but as a requirement. Its easy, it works, and its cheaper.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:48:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The mess we have in the current insurance environment isn't due to the free market at all, its due entirely to the current state of federal and state regulations over the insurance industry. There is no free market in this regard at all, it is all very heavily regulated.


Can you explain further, in detail?



The big one that comes to mind is not allowing health insurance sales across state lines.


Sure, that's definitely one to look at. But I'm interested in hearing Sanity - or anyone else, for that matter - explain in detail how the state and federal regulations on health insurance are directly and entirely responsible for the problems in our insurance system. I'd like to see some numbers, and a logical argument explaining what those numbers mean.




Sanity -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 4:55:28 PM)


Judging by your past posts I don't believe that you are interested in hearing from anyone who doesn't perfectly fall in line with your way of thinking. I believe that what you are after here is pure harassment, and nothing more, which yours isn't a game that I'm interested in playing now, or ever.




Arpig -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 5:03:13 PM)

I think you are getting Panda and me mixed up, Sanity. [:D]




Aylee -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 5:06:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The mess we have in the current insurance environment isn't due to the free market at all, its due entirely to the current state of federal and state regulations over the insurance industry. There is no free market in this regard at all, it is all very heavily regulated.


Can you explain further, in detail?



The big one that comes to mind is not allowing health insurance sales across state lines.


Sure, that's definitely one to look at. But I'm interested in hearing Sanity - or anyone else, for that matter - explain in detail how the state and federal regulations on health insurance are directly and entirely responsible for the problems in our insurance system. I'd like to see some numbers, and a logical argument explaining what those numbers mean.


Here is an article for you.  I am not certain that this is exactly what you are looking for, but I think that he makes some good points.  And he is an MD 

Link Here




hardbodysub -> RE: Costs of the uninsured/underinsured (9/18/2009 5:07:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The mess we have in the current insurance environment isn't due to the free market at all, its due entirely to the current state of federal and state regulations over the insurance industry. There is no free market in this regard at all, it is all very heavily regulated.


This belief is nothing more than adherence to an ideology that has proven itself to be severely flawed.




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125