DarkSteven
Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MMagic should said Dominate again be angry because the girl/boy he's chosen to collar does not HAVE the same perceptions. Should be something to be punished for? I know you'll say, if it was discussed before hand. Let's say it was not and the sub does...what they do. Should the Dominate automatically view it as affront to their nature? If a Dominant collared someone without any idea of who does what, I would say that both Dom and sub were very rushed and stupid. Iy is not an affront to the Dom's nature as much as a reminder that they acted hastily without thinking. A Dom who punished for this... I would think that the Dom would be more culpable for the situation than the sub. However, it could be a means of moving the sub more quickly to the place he wants. The whole situation bothers me a lot because a Dom who did this would be removing some of his sub's capability to act on his/her own. The situation as described shows that the collaring was done without thought, the relationship is far from stable, and yet the Dom is impairing the sub's ability to survive if the relationship dissolved He's not keeping his/her best interests in mind.
_____________________________
"You women.... The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs... Quit fretting. We men love you."
|