RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


GreedyTop -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 1:21:42 PM)

Hunky.. that vid is from Quebec.  WTF does it have to do with Pittsburgh?




tazzygirl -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 1:33:25 PM)

Yes because many here are small businesses, which will take a direct hit from the damage.




tazzygirl -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 1:35:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Do you know why he was snatched? was he snatched? we have no clue what happened. do you??? do you KNOW he was snatched and grabbed? or are you going by what you heard on the video that showed nothing leading up to the event, only that he was being taken away? did you read the report on how many businesses have sustained damage? on how many cops have been injured? and you want to whine about one person being shoved into the back of a car and driven off? how much you wanna bet that half those people who were recording were smart enough to grab a license number? how much you wanna bet that after he was dragged off, they didnt give him a second thought?


The army is separate from police.

LOL- you are worried over businesses sustaining damage?  

Ha!



Its the national guard, who was invited in to help, and it was never kept secret that they were invited in. Any and all protestors coming knew they would be here.

What is your issue?




pahunkboy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 1:39:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

Hunky.. that vid is from Quebec.  WTF does it have to do with Pittsburgh?


Well the provocateur vids on this event are not around yet-   the point is - they do this.  They did it in Seattle- and most likely they are doing this tactic in Pitt as well.

As to the business community  they did or did not want the g20 there?    Windows get broke- every g20 meeting.

So yes- it is not fair to the small businesses.  Where Pitt might have said thanks but no thanks. (to hosting the event)




tazzygirl -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 1:55:29 PM)

So because these little snot nose brats with nothing to do with their time and money but to go arouond protesting whatever is the cause of the moment should be allowed to cause damage to private and public property and we should just sit back and say... oh well? we asked for it?




pahunkboy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 2:16:29 PM)

...maybe writing congress and voting would reverse the path we are on.  I doubt it.

I don't know what the answer is.




tazzygirl -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 2:18:33 PM)

This isnt it... destroying what people work so hard for just to prove a selfish point. And, yes, i call it selfish, because anyone who was truly serious about making changes would not cause undue harm to people who had no choice in all this... simply because they can!... idiots!




pahunkboy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 2:23:48 PM)

Some of the crowd did look immature and out of touch.   The foundations are playing the one that hung the cap and trade banner.  They fund the opposition...





these types of meetings should be held on a ship in the ocean.


(one that sinks!!  ;-0)




pahunkboy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 2:35:51 PM)

As long as there are a few from Pitt- I should say hello when I drive out west.

I have been curious about Clearfield or Butler county- but to be frank- I am stuck here for a while.  (1 hour north of Harrisburg)




mnottertail -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 2:37:07 PM)

Any unmarked cars circling around the block looking you over, hunky?

R




pahunkboy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 2:54:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Any unmarked cars circling around the block looking you over, hunky?

R


No.  Just a few smug fat smart alecks on CM.




pahunkboy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 3:04:53 PM)

It sounds like Alex will be getting vids that will be interesting.

People being banned from sitting on their front porch.

provocateur-  they do this.  Weather that will be proven this time- who knows.  Those sound weapons sound absolutely awful.

The "law"  uses a tactic to corral protectors into a box.  I think they have vid of this.      When you consider the prostests per both presidential candidates in 2008 - and in 2004- the tactics have been used.




thornhappy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 3:09:12 PM)

Jeez, he's hardly a fat dude, hunk....




tazzygirl -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 3:28:09 PM)

Ya know, you see no locals somplaining. You have word of mouth, half cranked videos showing only part of the story and you are basing what occurred at other events to color what is happening here.

get back to me when you have something concrete, k?




Grofast -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 3:29:42 PM)

wiuld be a great joke to pull on the alex jones set(all the conspericie nuts) to post a staged snatch and grab on youtube esp as part of a subfriends kidnap fantasy. the govt nto capabble of any consperacies not cmpentn enuf
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Do you know why he was snatched? was he snatched? we have no clue what happened. do you??? do you KNOW he was snatched and grabbed? or are you going by what you heard on the video that showed nothing leading up to the event, only that he was being taken away? did you read the report on how many businesses have sustained damage? on how many cops have been injured? and you want to whine about one person being shoved into the back of a car and driven off? how much you wanna bet that half those people who were recording were smart enough to grab a license number? how much you wanna bet that after he was dragged off, they didnt give him a second thought?





Daddysredhead -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 3:48:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

It shows 2 guys in camo hauling a young man into an UNMARKED car. They stuff themselves into the back seat of it with him in between.


*wishes I could be the Redheaded sammich those two yummy soldiers "kidnapped"... it's so hard to pull off a good scene at times... le sigh*


quote:

You dont find that clip to raise questions?


no... come live in DC, you'll stop wondering about shit like this... trust me

quote:

posse


Everyone on the boards knows who the "Twue Posse" are, and these men are not it.

quote:

Those doing the kidnapping are not police.


I don't care if they are the police or soldiers... they are hotter than hell, and I'd let them "kidnap" me. (ok, but I'm kinda whorey like that)

quote:

we will get the tyranny we deserve


OK, you're kinda crazy... seriously.

quote:

Men in fatigues are not peace officers.


Um, still crazy.

quote:

Men with no work- will get drunk chase woman then there will be a fight over a girl- until government checks run out.


Where will they get their beer money? Or would it be better if they were fighting over a guy?

quote:

In any event- listen to Alex Jones. Or Bob Chapman, or Lyndon Larouch, or Marc Farber, or Jim Rogers, or gerald Celente, or Ron Paul, or Peter Schiff.


It's actually "Larouche," and he's another phukking whack-job. That's why he went to prison back in the 80's, when the Feds came to my home town in VA and raided his place because he was a damn crook. So... no thanks, I'd rather listen to nails go down a chalkboard in tandem with break linings being reduced to vapor on the interstate.

quote:

I have never been to a protest in my life.


Maybe you should.

quote:

So- snatch and grab is ok.


No. You have it mixed up. It's grabbing my snatch that is ok. But it has to be done by DaddyBoo or Jerome Bettis... there's another sexy Pittsburgh man. *thud*

quote:

And one poster here is worried about a tad amount of vandalism.


If vandalism if ok, where do you live? Should they start at your house first?

quote:

We had 2 world wars over tyranny.


Really? I thought we had them over a nice cup of tea.

quote:

I don't know what the answer is.


Honest to gary, I haven't even figured out what the hell the question is.

quote:

As long as there are a few from Pitt- I should say hello when I drive out west.


I'm sure they will leave the light on for you, sweetie.

quote:

Just a few smug fat smart alecks on CM.


See??? It always turns into a fat thread doesn't it? Phukking hell... [>:]

quote:

Those sound weapons sound absolutely awful.


If they are sound weapons, should they not "sound" awful?

Again... I am confused.

Red,
who posted to this thread in the spirit I felt it deserved... esp. since it is in P&oRS

*blows kisses to the "Twue Posse" and maybe a couple of those fake ones in the hot uniforms* [8D]




tazzygirl -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 4:02:01 PM)

Oh hun, if you think they are hot, you should have seen the group that came in last tuesday! talk about drool city! and on bikes no less!!!

ok, i gotta behave... eventually [:D]




Daddysredhead -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 4:05:22 PM)

I am a complete "serviceman" slut... I have been "patriotic" to a few in my day. *le sigh* [8D]




pahunkboy -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 4:31:16 PM)

It is true that Larouche had charges on him.

It is also true that in the 80s he was a nut.

however 2007- I note a very different guy.

http://larouchepac.com/lpactv?nid=11891   check out the Sept 25th AM report.  This vid is a pretty good analysis as to my moodiness.

Alex Jones does not do false flag ops- you must be confusing the provocateur tactics.

If you have any interest in resolving the globalism-  Larouche is a good starting point.

....my place was ....well my Ron Paul sign was ripped a few weeks ago.    boo hoo .   ;-0




Hansbrink51 -> RE: secret arrests now in Pitt!!! (9/25/2009 4:50:21 PM)

We need to cancel most all derivatives you should say.  Remember that mutual funds are a type of derivative if you think about it.  Groups of stocks wrapped up in a different product to take the risk of owning that one stock away.

But I do agree to take away some of them.  Especially the ones that Fannie and Freddie were putting out.  When they underlying mortgages were being called in because of default, the bonds had to be recalled and paid off at $1000 a pop!  How could Fannie and Freddie pay for those when they were buying more and more (per their charter) of the mortgages being written by others with the scores reaching down in the low 500's.  Just check any of the tranches from 2005 and on when the height of the home buying had hit  and now the first time buyers were of lower and lower income brackets and 'just getting' into homes with those low scores.

The subsequent bond defaults and their repayments of mass quantities all the while still making loans per their charter in 2008 are what caused the bubble to really burst.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125