Elisabella -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (10/6/2009 10:39:46 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Elisabella Reread please. I said chasing *isn't* torture. In your ethics, of course not. But I am pretty sure that when a bird (in this case) is disturbed with what it percieves is a threat, you are torturing that animal. Ever had birds? I do. I also know that approching a flock of strange birds, their pupils constrict whereas when I approch my own, or a flock that knows me, they do not. It's a sign of fear and used in defense. Torture isn't just about pulling the legs off craneflies! You have every right to consider scaring someone to be a form of torture. And every right to step in and stop someone from torturing animals. quote:
quote:
The 'common' part of common sense implies that it changes with the times, with the current sense of what's common. quote:
Right, decisions by a collective (majority or vocal enough minority) but since the ethics of that collective change based on time and place, it would follow that what is considered common sense would chage as well, right? Yes. However common isn't defined as change. I would be interested in which dictionary you get that definition from. I didn't say common was defined as change. I said that the idea that the sense involved was common implies that it's common to the beliefs of the time and place, and as time and place changes then what is common changes as well. Hence, "implies" rather than "is defined as". And really what does this have to do with the price of tea in China? quote:
quote:
quote:
Toss Daddysprop's guardian in Afghanistan and common sense would say he's fine. Point is he's here, not there. [8|] I cannot even bring myself to respond on that (IMO bigoted) stereotype. A fine example of common sense? quote:
Well I know marital rape is legal there. And in many western countries, it's not even acknowledged. It's been tried and it's failed a conviction in many places. That is an interesting and utterly irrelevant tidbit. quote:
quote:
And I believe corporal punishment of family members is as well. And you advocate the death penelty. I'm less of an advocate and more of a passive supporter, in the case of capital crimes. quote:
quote:
I was using "you" in the second-person, not in the general 'anyone' meaning. Do you mean that you, personally, can't have an ethical viewpoint unless you want to involve yourself in it directly? The ethics which apply within our life and those involved by choice. I'm not sure what you mean by that. quote:
quote:
The reasons are to steal his shoes. Because the stabber wants them. You really think that's vague? Yes. Is there a particular part you'd like clarified? quote:
quote:
I would report it because I think what he is doing is illegal and unethical. I don't need to know what would be the ideal situation for her to know that what he's doing is wrong. We're discussing two different things here. You're talking about whether she should be rescued. I'm talking about whether he should be stopped. Same end result, yes, but far different motivations. No I am not talking about her being rescued at all. And what does that do for your life? Well you seemed to think my decision to report it was motivated by my (assumed) belief I knew what's right for her. If not, I'm glad we're on the same page. I don't understand the question "what does that do for your life?" - how would reporting criminal behavior in someone else's home affect my life? quote:
quote:
It is what I've been discussing, for most of this thread. OK. So not what? Well we either agree or disagree on whether he is being abusive. Not that it really matters. quote:
quote:
I presume this means you disagree with me on the just course of action to take? For me - if it is the above? Yes. Fair enough. The choice not to act is an action as well. I'm not going to try to prevent you from taking that path. quote:
quote:
It's been decided that she's legally mentally incompetent. I wouldn't be reporting her incompetence, I'd be reporting the fact that her guardian is battering her. Whether or not you consider it abuse (I do, and that's what I've been saying the whole time) it IS battering. I just do not see how not being bothered or obsessed by DaddysProps relationship = feeling the need to report it. Obsessed? Seriously? I thought you only did discussion, not argument. What's with the potshots? And if you don't see how seeing something you consider to be a heinous crime would lead to feeling like you have to report it, I'm not sure I can explain. I wouldn't feel right about myself if I had the ability to step in and didn't. That's really all I can say. quote:
quote:
Then perhaps she'd find a better reception on a non-BDSM board. There are pro-ana sites, I'm sure if she made a pro-DV one she'd get quite a following of support. Ah, so what you are actually now saying is that it wasn't me who based her relationship on BDSM but everyone else? So now we all become specialised and cozy in our safe sane and totally consensual BDSM family? Because of commonality? Seriously? You really believe you have much in common with the majority here when you state that you don't believe your relationship needs 'work'? Maybe you are the one who should start a site of 'Perfect relationships'? No, I'm saying if Daddysprop isn't in a BDSM relationship she does herself a disservice by discussing it on a BDSM board where standards are different from her own. I don't know if I have much in common with the majority here. I know I don't have a perfect relationship. But you know, there comes a point where "working" on it just messes it up. I get annoyed my fiance plays video games all day on his days off. But I know it makes him happy and relieves stress. So if I go and mess with it, read John Grey or Cosmo or something that will try to tell me "how to fix my man in 10 surefire steps" I'll likely stress him out and make him resent me a bit. Imperfection does not equate to fixability. Not always. quote:
quote:
If you don't believe in consent, what do you see as the difference between a ravishment scene and date rape? One is a fantasy and one is reality. And what is it that separates the fantasy of rape from the reality of rape if not the consent of the one being raped? quote:
quote:
By disinterested I meant I don't have any personal stake in the thing. I'd report it out of a sense of right and wrong, not any personal interest. So it's a moral highground judgement then and you do not have a personal interest on what is good for Daddy's Prop. Just so long as we (the majority) are clear. Are you religous by the way? It is an ethical judgement, yes, and no I do not have a personal interest in it. Are you saying you're the majority? No I'm not religious. I'm a freelance pagan. quote:
quote:
I don't think we're going to agree about this. I feel if I see something wrong I should say or do something about it, if I'm able. I see that you don't think there's anything wrong in what's going on, but what do you think a person should do when they see something they feel is wrong? That depends if someone desires help or not. Fair enough. I think that's the crux of where we differ. quote:
quote:
I mean I'm not talking about going to his house and lynching him, Why not? Because then I would be no better than he is. quote:
quote:
I'm talking about reporting the facts of the situation to whichever agency appointed him to be her legal guardian. This isn't Gitmo, he'll get an attorney and a trial and all that. I just wonder, if you think that the deadly people are the ones who step up to try to stop what they view as injustice, how can you bring up abolitionists and suffragettes and all in your other post, implying that you support them? Either you believe people should speak up for what they believe in or you don't, you can't have it hinge on whether or not you agree with the person. Because they have a stake in the injustice! Because there is someone suggesting that an injustice has been done to them! So the men who marched for womens' suffrage and the northern whites who fought against slavery were just nosey busybodies like me? quote:
In DaddysProps case... neither have occured. You aren't involved. You have nothing at stake (your own admission), you don't care and are not obsessed. Having looked at your profile, you don't have anything in common with her. If I saw a bank being robbed, I'd call the police. Regardless of whether I had my money kept at that bank or another one. I think it's pretty selfish to only speak out against something if it affects you personally. quote:
I get that you think it's all wrong and abusive. But unless you have a vested interest in the relationship or situation, unless it effects you personally, you don't care about DaddysProp or whether this is her words of fantasy or reality, just your own morals - self sated. I don't know her as a person, how could I care about her? I care about her in the abstract sense, as a person being victimized, but not on the individual level. I also care about society, and about justice, and about stopping people from taking advantage of the defenseless. Yes those are my ethics, at least some of them, you say it as though a person caring about living an ethical life is a bad thing. Please. You know, lots of people are abused every day and they don't want to speak out or ask for help because they love their abuser, or they fear living on their own and taking care of themselves, or a million other reasons. They can even convince themselves and others that they like the abuse - ie "isn't he sweet, he loves me so much" to explain why a boyfriend calls 10 times when she goes out with her friends, or "aww he came to pick me up to make sure I got home safe" when he shows up stalkerlike to make sure she's not with another guy. I just don't see how "she isn't asking you to stop him from abusing her" equates to "it's okay for him to abuse her."
|
|
|
|