RE: Is is ABO? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

HatesParisHilton -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 6:07:38 AM)

/ROARS laughing!

Dude, I just imagined the helium...

WHILE you did a Samuel impersonation!!!!

perfect!



thishereboi -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 6:59:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse
Sarah Palins new book is already a best seller on the NYT and Amazon lists,and it isn't even in print yet. Do not count her out. The left is scared to death just thinking about her.


For COMPLETELY different reasons than the Right thinks we are, though.


You are? And what reasons are they?



SpinnerofTales -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 2:10:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse
Sarah Palins new book is already a best seller on the NYT and Amazon lists,and it isn't even in print yet. Do not count her out. The left is scared to death just thinking about her.


For COMPLETELY different reasons than the Right thinks we are, though.


You are? And what reasons are they?



Are you sure you want an honest answer to that?



HatesParisHilton -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 10:02:52 PM)

No, she wants the ghost of Andrea Dworkin to come back like the Crow did (but as a proper dibbuk, not a revenant, possessing the body of  Rebecca Miller, the female version of Ed Wood who uses chickflicks with no fucking plot the way Ed used Tor Johnson) to kick Ialdabaoth's ass Stewie-back-in-time-to-WW2-Berlin style.

With a Blue Heeler and a Border Collie with the voices of Germaine Greer and Penny Wong instead of Brian.

Re-Con (meaning the animation definition of the word, as in "revised continuity") is a wonderful thing.

Sucks millions of  lefty and pink dollars in EVERY YEAR.



Ialdabaoth -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 10:42:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HatesParisHilton

No, she wants the ghost of Andrea Dworkin to come back like the Crow did (but as a proper dibbuk, not a revenant, possessing the body of  Rebecca Miller, the female version of Ed Wood who uses chickflicks with no fucking plot the way Ed used Tor Johnson) to kick Ialdabaoth's ass Stewie-back-in-time-to-WW2-Berlin style.

With a Blue Heeler and a Border Collie with the voices of Germaine Greer and Penny Wong instead of Brian.

Re-Con (meaning the animation definition of the word, as in "revised continuity") is a wonderful thing.

Sucks millions of  lefty and pink dollars in EVERY YEAR.


I'm having trouble parsing this post; can you spell it out for me?



HatesParisHilton -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 10:49:01 PM)

dude, no.  it's a post for people who more than a mere consumer-interest in pop culture, so meaning no offense and having no intent to be impolite, no, I can't.

It'd be like me explaining Velasquez Glaze over scumbling Principle in accordance with the lean-to-fat principle of Fine Art if you'd never taken an advanced drawing class.  sorry, but no.

(and I've taught the Velazquez Principle so I'm allowed to use that in this context here).



TheHeretic -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 10:57:27 PM)

Quick translation:  In the absence of any ability to dazzle with brilliance, fall back to baffling with bullshit.  It's a rule so old they were putting it on t-shirts in the 1970's.

DSM...  How nice.  I learned about this shit from the family photo album, and girls who wound up afraid I will find them again.



HatesParisHilton -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:04:09 PM)

"Quick translation:  In the absence of any ability to dazzle with brilliance, fall back to baffling with bullshit.  It's a rule so old they were putting it on t-shirts in the 1970's. "

actually not. and I'll bet you've never painted anything except your walls and never been published in any creative media whatsover, but I might be wrong.  There is nothing baffling or bullshit about references to art YOUR taxes have paid to have on display in the USA, Heretic.  In fact, yourtaxes have in part paid to teach people how to learn the techniques of said artist. Nothing baffling, just "anti braindead fratboy".  Admittedly it would be baffling to someone who'd greatest creative expression would be deciding how to paint their team colours on their chest for "The Big Game".

Also, reductionist bullshit (as per your 70's tshirt comment above) was also exemplified (and monetized) in the 70's with the greatest example of Con-Philosophy made into product:  The Pet Rock.

DSM...  How nice.  I learned about this shit from the family photo album, and girls who wound up afraid I will find them again.
 
So you were raised in a Group Home.  So what?




Ialdabaoth -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:07:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HatesParisHilton

dude, no.  it's a post for people who more than a mere consumer-interest in pop culture, so meaning no offense and having no intent to be impolite, no, I can't.

It'd be like me explaining Velasquez Glaze over scumbling Principle in accordance with the lean-to-fat principle of Fine Art if you'd never taken an advanced drawing class.  sorry, but no.

(and I've taught the Velazquez Principle so I'm allowed to use that in this context here).


Well, I understand most of the components you're referencing (especially Dworkin), but I can't seem to layer them together into a coherent message that fits the direction of the conversation. It seems like a more direct, less metaphorical version of the message would be in order.



HatesParisHilton -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:17:39 PM)

whic would suck the cock of the uncreative and mediocre at the expense of the surreal and poetic.

1000 people read Daniel Steele and her dot to dash sentence structure and lack of abstractionist artistry for every ONE person whom has read the magic that is the first novel by Douglas Cooper.

As a paid artist and writer, kid, when I get paid even 2 cents for you reading my posts, I'll tailor them for you as you asked above.  Proportionately.  Until then, I write what I like, how I fucking like and until I get paid a dime to hold to any social convention or netiquette you are comfy with, I don't give a shit about such.

while it's for free, it's about "Me". 

Think of it this way:

until you buy a comic book, you have shit-all to say as to how any comic is drawn.  Until you buy a painting, you have shit all to say anything about work hanging in  agallery that you walk through with a chick just to impress her to get her into bed later.

these posts are paintings in a gallery.

and if they suck, too bad.  when things are for free, suckage is allowed.  period.



Ialdabaoth -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:19:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HatesParisHilton

whic would suck the cock of the uncreative and mediocre at the expense of the surreal and poetic.

1000 people read Daniel Steele and her dot to dash sentence structure and lack of abstractionist artistry for every ONE person whom has read the magic that is the first novel by Douglas Cooper.

As a paid artist and writer, kid, when I get paid even 2 cents for you reading my posts, I'll tailor them for you as you asked above.  Proportionately.  Until then, I write what I like, how I fucking like and until I get paid a dime to hold to any social convention or netiquette you are comfy with, I don't give a shit about such.

while it's for free, it's about "Me". 

Think of it this way:

until you buy a comic book, you have shit-all to say as to how any comic is drawn.  Until you buy a painting, you have shit all to say anything about work hanging in  agallery that you walk through with a chick just to impress her to get her into bed later.

these posts are paintings in a gallery.

and if they suck, too bad.  when things are for free, suckage is allowed.  period.


Wha...?

I thought your intent was to communicate information. I was politely informing you that I lost the content of your communication. If you weren't trying to communicate with me, then I must admit I'm somewhat puzzled as to your intent here.



HatesParisHilton -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:27:30 PM)

"Wha...?

I thought your intent was to communicate information. I was politely informing you that I lost the content of your communication. If you weren't trying to communicate with me, then I must admit I'm somewhat puzzled as to your intent here. "
 
communicaton by your definition of it is only one third of communication by MY definition. 

have you taken the time to stare at original Goya paintings, for more than 5 minutes per painting, at all?  would you be able to remember - in your head - what Goya paintings looked like WITHOUT googling them or hitting a wiki?

GOYA was a communicator.  As was DALI.  As was VELASQUEZ.  and what these men communicated supercedes centures of political change, language evolution and decay, and even barriers of Language itself. 

what I have just above said is BASIC to anyone with an OUNCE of art in their soul, Kid.  Was it commubicative to you?

If not, then not.  I am under no obligation to limit my joy in MY definition of communication because you simply don't dig what I dig. 



Ialdabaoth -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:31:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HatesParisHilton

"Wha...?

I thought your intent was to communicate information. I was politely informing you that I lost the content of your communication. If you weren't trying to communicate with me, then I must admit I'm somewhat puzzled as to your intent here. "
 
communicaton by your definition of it is only one third of communication by MY definition. 

have you taken the time to stare at original Goya paintings, for more than 5 minutes per painting, at all?  would you be able to remember - in your head - what Goya paintings looked like WITHOUT googling them or hitting a wiki?

GOYA was a communicator.  As was DALI.  As was VELASQUEZ.  and what these men communicated supercedes centures of political change, language evolution and decay, and even barriers of Language itself. 

what I have just above said is BASIC to anyone with an OUNCE of art in their soul, Kid.  Was it commubicative to you?

If not, then not.  I am under no obligation to limit my joy in MY definition of communication because you simply don't dig what I dig. 



I get what you're saying (I personally prefer Dali to Goya or Velasquez, only because he was willing to transcend the conventions of form when crafting his message). The thing is... well, actually, no. At this point I'm afraid any further discussion we might have on this point will just rope me into a pissing contest, and I don't see how that will serve either of us.



TheHeretic -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:31:41 PM)

You'd be losing your bet, Hates, almost as quickly as you've lost my interest.  Dilettantes get boring so quickly.  One crazy bitch you decide to slum with puts a cutting edge to your vitals, you think you have a lovely little metaphor to sound cool with. 

Fratboys?  Jesus Christ, but you come from a sheltered little world, don't you?  Let's hope none of the trust fund is with somebody who went to school with Bernie Madoff, huh?



HatesParisHilton -> RE: Is is ABO? (10/2/2009 11:38:36 PM)

"I get what you're saying (I personally prefer Dali to Goya or Velasquez, only because he was willing to transcend the conventions of form when crafting his message). The thing is... well, actually, no. At this point I'm afraid any further discussion we might have on this point will just rope me into a pissing contest, and I don't see how that will serve either of us. "

no pissing contest.  I just view gutterspeak and standardized diction to be of equal value and any disparity of value comes from what the speaker or author is actually trying to SAY.  Spike from the Goons versus Seinfeld.

"You'd be losing your bet, Hates, almost as quickly as you've lost my interest.  Dilettantes get boring so quickly.  One crazy bitch you decide to slum with puts a cutting edge to your vitals, you think you have a lovely little metaphor to sound cool with. 

Fratboys?  Jesus Christ, but you come from a sheltered little world, don't you?  Let's hope none of the trust fund is with somebody who went to school with Bernie Madoff, huh?"

Dude, it's not possible to lose a bet with you since the only money you have in your hand is from a Monopoly Board Game  circa 1966.

And frankly if I lost your interest that means you'll post less "at" me and that means I win the bet, by default.

dinner time, back later.

besides, Heretic, I think you're really Bobby Lee from Mad TV.  Posting hard and fast with the flavour of Flanagan's clit still fresh on your tongue...





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0234375