Ialdabaoth
Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008 From: Tempe, AZ Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote:
ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth :( When you guys start arguing like this, it makes it REALLY hard for anyone to get any actual thinking done about the topic. Didn't you see me complimenting Spinner on living up to his nic? Discussing the topic is the LAST thing some would want to happen here. I... well, what if we back away from the topic for a moment, and talk about what general philosophical guidelines might inform such decisions? Here's a few: 1. Nationalism vs. Globalism - a) At what scale do the rights of individuals trump the rights of nations, and at what scale do the rights of nations trump the rights of individuals? b) What does it mean for something to be a country? At what point does an entity deserve recognition? c.1) If a country is mistreating its own citizens, when do other countries have the right to interfere? c.2) If a country is mistreating other country's citizens, when do those other countries have the right to interfere? c.3) If a country is mistreating other country's citizens, when do uninvolved other countries have the right to interfere? d) Where does my loyalty to my country end? d.1) What actions committed or attempted by my government are proper to question, and what actions are improper to question? d.2) What actions committed or attempted by my government are proper to resist, and what actions are improper to resist? d.3) What actions committed or attempted by my government justify force to resist them, and what actions are improper to use force to resist? 2. Values vs. Multiculturalism - a) Whose values should be applied to global political situations, and why? b) What causes values to be correct or incorrect? Are there "meta-values", and if so, are there "meta-meta-values"? b.1) How far meta- should we take this question, and why? c) Does might make right? c.1) If not, then why do situations often require force to "correct" them? c.2) If yes, then where's Henry Kissinger when you need him? 3. Religion vs. Secularism a) Can my God beat up your God? b) If God is on my side, should I destroy my enemies? If God is on my enemies' side, should I be destroyed? c) If I am being destroyed by my enemies, does that necessarily mean God is on their side? d) If I believe God is on my side, and my enemies believe God is on their side, how do we tell who is right? d.1) How do we know whether this is the correct method of telling who is right? d.1.a) How do we know whether this is the correct method of telling what the correct method of telling who is right? d.1.a.1) How far meta- should we take this question?
|