RE: Reliability

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Reliability

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: Reliability

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Reliability - 10/7/2009 1:59:14 AM

WestBaySlave

Posts: 501
Joined: 9/24/2008
Status: offline

As for subs vs. slaves - well, everyone is a person first. Slaves are not inherently more reliable in any sense, even when it's a case of them being your slave or your submissive.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Verfor99

...notify me that they have decided against me.

I think if it's a matter of a couple emails or a few minutes chat, there may not be any commitment perceived on their side. They may not know you want to be informed, and may not even think of it as deciding against you - merely as a brief interchange that didn't lead anywhere.

I remember getting a message from a master "releasing me" as his slave, and frankly, I had no clue who he was or that I ever had been that! It turns out we'd chatted briefly on a chatroom weeks prior, and he'd taken my friendliness as mean a great deal more than it implied. How each person perceives a brief conversation can vary a great deal, it seems...

(in reply to Verfor99)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Reliability - 10/9/2009 7:28:40 AM

AnnaOfAramis

Posts: 523
Joined: 7/30/2008
Status: offline

Well, here's another take on it, for what it's worth. An unowned slave, only has the potential to be a slave. Living by themselves, they are in fact mastering themselves. It isn't until they meet someone who is capable of mastering them personally, that they start responding to that person as a slave. This is different than them trying to "act like a slave", which again is still under their own control. I'm referring to the development of internal enslavement. This process takes time. I would say that until that happens, a slave is not going to be necessarily more reliable than a submissive, and indeed they may even be more likely to be less reliable, as a natural slave does better under someone else's rule. Just a different way of looking at it.

(in reply to Verfor99)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Reliability - 10/9/2009 8:34:49 AM

littleone35

Posts: 2828
Joined: 2/17/2005
Status: offline

You need a reality check guy. Just cause someome gives themselves or have been given the label of slave that suddenly changes them? If they are always late to everything and undependable that will not change just cause they have the label of slave. I am a submissive and i am very dependable and obedient. It depends on the person themselves not what label they have.

Matt's littleone

(in reply to AnnaOfAramis)

Profile

Post #: 23