OrionTheWolf -> RE: Extreme BDSM & Ethics (10/6/2009 4:45:45 PM)
|
The line I draw is if it is detrimental to me, my household, or my property. I determine what is or is not detrimental. Just like I determine safe, and sane. She consented when she took my collar, and only taking those rights back by walking out the door does the consent stop, and even then it depends. My property thrives and grows since placed in my collar, and I asked her where the line is; her response "where ever my owner determines it to be." If it requires me breaking a bone to gain obedience, would rather just show them the door, but a split lip from a backhand because of a smart mouth is rather minor. Then again I am part of that group that people call extreme, abuser, sociopath, etc.. My girl just smiles when that kind of stuff comes up. If there is consent involved then no oen else determines where the line is. Mack the knife is funny ;) quote:
ORIGINAL: daintydimples I've been trying to catch up with all the reading in the 24/7 TPE thread, and came across an issue that has been on my mind for some time. I'm posting here so as not to (further) hijack that thread. The issue is, how far is too far? If an activity is consensual, does that make it okay? Where do you, personally, draw the line? Bone breaking? Amputation? Reliving past incest?
|
|
|
|