elegantcdgoddess
Posts: 47
Joined: 7/28/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote:
ORIGINAL: elegantcdgoddess quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote:
ORIGINAL: Arpig ~FR~ quote:
"There was a reading from the gospel, and the pronoun used to refer to a child in this translation was 'it'," he said. "So this translation of the gospel referred to a child as an 'it,' a thing. And that is liberal, it's offensive and it's incorrect." Why is referring to a child of unspecified gender as "it" liberal? I would have thought that was simply grammatically correct. I guess it just shows the extremes that people will go to, to turn anything into a left vs right problem. And true conservative should make few versions of bible. In my humble oppinion they need PG-13, and R at least. Right needs to act to prevent our innocent children from being exposed to graphic violence and sexual acts. I dont think there is any true right wingnut who will allow his or hers child to even look at old testament. Probably liberal left added that. Daddy what did Ham do to naked drunk Noah in Genesis 9? You can argue left vs. right in bible forever, lol. Maybe if you explain what a "true conservative" is, this will make more sense. Oh and where are they teaching kids graphic violence and sexual acts. I must have missed that sunday. Go figure. Seriously? Genesis. Including sex with minor, incest, sex with drunk person, rape. Now for graphic violence, hmmm. Entire Revelation maybe? Including stripping naked, killing, eating human flesh, cooking human flesh. It is book people, what is the big issue. One of the greatest literature of the human civilization.
|