Lucienne
Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leadership527 Carol very strongly considers herself a feminist. I myself am pretty staunchly for equal rights. I'm a bit horrified at the spin some branches of feminism have taken. I see no useful purpose in half the human race detesting the other half. But insofar as feminism is about choice and not men being bad, I'm all there too. Obviously, any feminist who agreed it was about choice would also have no problem with a D/s relationship once they understood consent was present. Those feminists who have adopted the "men are bad" mantra are going to have a more difficult time with the whole thing. I think this is a false frame that is dismissive and unfair to the concerns expressed by many feminists. The number of feminists who believe that "men are bad" and "detestable" is so small that you can safely ignore them unless you're dealing with a feminist who expressly identifies herself as someone who detests all men. To attribute that negative attitude to your average feminist is unsupportable. When you're dividing feminists into two groups - those who agree with you and those who hate all men - you're not really engaging the issue. Hating or resenting the patriarchy isn't the same thing as hating men. The patriarchy is bigger than all of us, and it has negative effects on men as well as women. I'm quite certain there are feminists who believe in the importance of self-determination who maintain strong reservations about D/s. Respecting someone's right to choose is not the same thing as respecting someone's choice. Something that it is important to understand about feminism is that while it values and aspires to greater individual freedom, it recognizes that we live in a society that, to greater and lesser degrees, frequently ignores individuality. The idea that "she makes all women look bad," for example. White guys might jokingly deal with that notion in the context of dating, but rarely if ever in the workplace. White guys are allowed to be individual assholes and fuck ups in ways that women and minorities are not. A woman being an asshole will frequently have the flaw attributed to her gender, rather than her individual personality. Because of that tendency, the actions of individuals arguably do have an effect on how the group is treated. In that sense, choosing to live a patriarchy reinforcing lifestyle under the umbrella of bdsm will be seen by some feminists as not only an unhealthy individual choice (that a person is free to make), but an individual choice that has negative consequences on other women outside that individual's relationship. There are people out there who have put a great deal more thought into this than I have and can express it much more eloquently (none of whom are likely to drop into this forum. lol). What I'm trying to say is that when I've seen feminists criticize bdsm in general it's either garden variety vanilla prudery or, more frequently, an expression of concern about harm to women in general. I guess the point is that feminists critics in the latter group are not motivated by hatred of men, or a desire to control the lives of others, but a defensiveness to perceived harm to women outside the individual bdsm relationship. You may consider that defensiveness irrational, but if you don't recognize it, then you're not going to understand what those critics are arguing. The extent to which the outside consequences/perceived harms are real and how to deal with them is something I struggle with as a feminist. I think it's truer than I want it to be, but not as bad as many suggest. But I also think that the concept of "sisterhood" is ultimately more patriarchy reinforcing bullshit. As for dealing with my personal urges towards submissiveness, I don't have any problem reconciling it with my feminism because it's something I see based in reciprocity and equality. For me, it's about freely negotiated contracts, not property.
|