Rule
Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Any population in which the penis of their males is circumcised - including Muslims and USA Christians - by my definition is on the Jewish physiological and cultural evolutionary track, eventually - after a number of generations - resulting in increased frequency of homosexuality (I expect; research is required), increased frequency of congenital diseases (and ugliness; it is a package deal), polygamy (and rapists; another package deal), crime and hence the sharia (including the stoning, drowning and throat cutting and 'honour' murders of females), and in martyrdom. .... These are your assumptions.. and quite a stretch they are. Without data to support your claims, they are nothing more than your beliefs. It is also my assumption that when I add 55 and 56, I get something larger than 100, considering that both are larger than 100 divided by 2. What can I say? I did study biology for a fair number of years and in biology I was the best in my class. I have an innate aptitude for biology. Often I knew what my biology teacher was going to say before he said it; he was that good and I was that good. Also I am a supergenius. I would love more data, but the data that I do have, however circumstantial, is sufficient for someone with my abilities to formulate this best fit hypothesis that elegantly attributes all the problems that plague populations that practice circumcision to that very practice. This is what distinguishes a superior hypothesis that is most likely right from a multitude of different hypotheses that each try to explain one particular phenomenon and that are likely to all be wrong.
|