OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
Damn correcting you seems to be a habit lately. I used Isaiah 45:7 and something written in the Tao Te Ching, to compare the two. Basically both state something similar to a lot of neo-paganism, and that is nature is neither good or evil, it just is. So do people disagree that whatever created the universe, just is, and is neither good nor evil? This whatever could be anything from a fluke incident, mathematical equation, or a supreme being. My OP also asked if anyone else knew of others, but those that are threatened and insecure by a belief of any kind, seem to have used this to bash at beliefs again, and have nothing meaningful to add to discussion. So where is the disagreements in the statements anyway? quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl This is formal, organized religion, based upon the teachings of men, many with ulterior motives. Find me where these truths lay with Ghandi. With any informal religious belief. Then we can speak of universal truths. Until then, its turning into a religion bashing thread, not unlike many of the others. Actually, it seems to be a religion-promoting thread, by Orion stating that a quote from Isaiah is a "universal truth". So you can't call it bashing when you have disagreement with that statement.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|