thornhappy
Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote:
ORIGINAL: thornhappy Prior to Christianity, it was "Do not unto others as you would have them do not unto you." It does make a difference... some Christians proselytise to anyone they perceive as unbelievers, much to the "unbelievers" annoyance. But those Christians will consider this valid under the Golden Rule, since of course you would want to be saved from eternal damnation. Now, consider if said Christians were to receive the same from Jews or Muslims. They'd probably take offense, saying that they were firm in their religious beliefs. Under the second version, you wouldn't proselytise, because you wouldn't want folks trying to convert you. Some.... some do... some dont... but we lump them all into the "do" pile because they may, regardless if they have. No, I'm thinking of folks that I've known who consider acquaintances to be opportunities for witnessing first, instead of simply being a friend. They regard the Great Commission as the highest priority in any contact with "non-believers", as opposed to the Great Commandment. In those cases "non-believers" may include non-fundamentalist Christians (sometimes even fundamentalists that aren't from the same organization), Jews, Buddhists, etc. I ran into this a lot when I lived in San Diego.
|