lovingpet
Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Level quote:
ORIGINAL: lovingpet quote:
ORIGINAL: Level I think what's tripping me up is the inclusion of "vanilla"; can somebody be vanilla and kinky? Bingo! That's the question. It is still dual orientation isn't it? So theoretically it should be possible, right? lovingpet Not according to how I understand the terminology to be (but I'm open to convincing to the contrary). The duality of a switch is inclusive of some combination of top/dominant & bottom/submissive. Vanilla is the absence of those traits. Or is there an angle I'm missing? Okay, if I am dominant, I am currently lacking submissive traits. If I am submissive, I am currently lacking dominant traits. Is it not possible then to occasionally display kink traits, and not be vanilla or to sometime identify as vanilla and not display those same kink traits? This gets into whether a switch can be a weal and twue subbie or dom in that a similar question gets raised. Just like you asked it, can a vanilla person be a weal and twue kinky person or vise versa? Duality is confuzzling, but rather fascinating. lovingpet
_____________________________
If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me 10 Fluffy pts.
|