RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 11:54:40 AM)


People enjoy them, ergo they should be there.

The only ones who seem to be complaining is the man, on behalf of a handful of religious extremists (which would include the Earth First! types).

I never thought I'd see the day that Liberals were arguing vehemently against Bohemian nature lovers on the behalf of some religious fundamentalists.

Its such a strange world sometimes...


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
This is mind-boggling, even for you. You acknowledge that they are not supposed to be there, but can not comprehend why something that  is not supposed to be there has to be removed?

Do you even read what you write?





tazzygirl -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 11:56:19 AM)

1. Why are the religious concerns even relevant?  ~~ isnt even relevant

and

2. Why destroy them now? What reason could there possibly be. ~~ no permits... no inspections... the Forestry service has a duty to ensure public safety.




mnottertail -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:00:21 PM)

in that article, here is more what happened:

indians said, thats religious ground, we want it gone (cause they seen it and complained) and hey they are people too, they just got a reason you don't like.

USFS: becoming aware of it.... hey, he didn't get a permit to do this, (as is required by law) hold a hearing (as is required by law) and get an environmental impact statement (as is required by law), therefore it has to come down (as is required by law), but some folks like it, and it ain't a bad idea, so if he gets the permit and does the rest (as required by law) we could see it being built.

that is about all there is, there is no larger issue here. It is not just a good idea, it is the law.


constitutional conservative




Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:00:38 PM)


Hey tazzygirl,

Should a permit be required in order to step out of your car while driving through Forest Service land? (In some national forests it is.)

And should a permit be required for a few kids to rearrange a few rocks in a stream so they can have a little bit deeper pool to play in (not in a national park or a designated wilderness area, just some ordinary river somewhere)?


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

1. Why are the religious concerns even relevant?  ~~ isnt even relevant

and

2. Why destroy them now? What reason could there possibly be. ~~ no permits... no inspections... the Forestry service has a duty to ensure public safety.





Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:03:03 PM)


But mnottertail,

Aren't we all children of the Earth mother?

Isn't it all sacred ground and water?

Isn't everything sacred?

Especially sex, and drugs, and rock and roll?

[;)]


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

in that article, here is more what happened:

indians said, thats religious ground, we want it gone (cause they seen it and complained) and hey they are people too, they just got a reason you don't like.

USFS: becoming aware of it.... hey, he didn't get a permit to do this, (as is required by law) hold a hearing (as is required by law) and get an environmental impact statement (as is required by law), therefore it has to come down (as is required by law), but some folks like it, and it ain't a bad idea, so if he gets the permit and does the rest (as required by law) we could see it being built.

that is about all there is, there is no larger issue here. It is not just a good idea, it is the law.


constitutional conservative




mnottertail -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:05:39 PM)

and the religious argument was not the reason that they say it has to come down, the burden of proof will be on the tribe.

The bitch is what made them aware of it.

and fuck a bunch of earth mothers, K? Nothing to do with what it is.

Ron




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:05:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


People enjoy them, ergo they should be there.



What a childish argument. I'm sure some people would enjoy a go-cart track there, too. Most people wouldn't, but some would probably consider it an "improvement." Does that  mean if someone sneaks in and builds one in the middle of the night, there's no reason to close it down? If someone builds a motocross course in the Badlands, do we just leave it there because some people enjoy it? The structures are not supposed to be there, they were built illegally, done deal.




Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:08:11 PM)


Your argument is worse. "Is not supposed to be there" sounds... well, worse. "Just because" or "Because I said" isn't an argument at all. The fact that people enjoy them is an argument. And again, you're building strawmen, no one is arguing for a go cart track or a motocross in a national park...

[8|]


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

What a childish argument. I'm sure some people would enjoy a go-cart track there, too. Most people wouldn't, but some would probably consider it an "improvement." Does that  mean if someone sneaks in and builds one in the middle of the night, there's no reason to close it down? If someone builds a motocross course in the Badlands, do we just leave it there because some people enjoy it? The structures are not supposed to be there, they were built illegally, done deal.





mnottertail -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:09:17 PM)

no, his argument is not 'because' his argument is 'because it is the law', same as mine.




Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:10:29 PM)


"The law" doesn' require their removal, mnottertail.


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

no, his argument is not 'because' his argument is 'because it is the law', same as mine.




mnottertail -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:11:27 PM)

what planet are you from? the law requires their removal.




Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:14:19 PM)


The law doesn't require their removal, religious fundamentalists require their removal, and the Federal Government is at their beck and call.

And you're in favor of that?

Because people could be havin' wild sex orgies in them pools?

There are all kinds of structures on Federal lands that have never been approved by anyone and which no one insists have to go. Which law are you referring to. Sure, everything requires a permit now. Scratchin' your ass? Get a permit first. But the laws don't require that anything has to be destroyed.


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

what planet are you from? the law requires their removal.




mnottertail -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:20:13 PM)

No, federal law requires removal and restoration, and CAN (not SHALL) include taking anything that was used in the commission of crime, that is his vehicle, anything in it, his checkbook including cash if it is found that he paid with check for the mortar, tools and costs of reclamation.

R




Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:23:10 PM)


In a wilderness area maybe, or in a national park. But otherwise, nah. You're wading in it pretty deep.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, federal law requires removal and restoration, and CAN (not SHALL) include taking anything that was used in the commission of crime, that is his vehicle, anything in it, his checkbook including cash if it is found that he paid with check for the mortar, tools and costs of reclamation.

R




pahunkboy -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:30:45 PM)

back in the old neighborhood- a neighbor went thru a waiver to build a over sized garage.

it was quite the exception to what was allowed.

Anyhow- now 20 years later- when I was looking at tax assessments- the county does not acknowledge the improvement.  If they ever DO - then 20 years of under assessments could surface. 




mnottertail -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:37:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The law doesn't require their removal, religious fundamentalists require their removal, and the Federal Government is at their beck and call.

And you're in favor of that?

Because people could be havin' wild sex orgies in them pools?



Ah, tinfoiling and cherry picking......this from your own original link which you have clipped to change the viewpoint of what ACTUALLY OCCURRED.


These pools were built without a permit by one man.

"He was very cooperative. He was a well intentioned individual. But what he did was a violation of the U.S. Forest Service," said John Erickson, District Ranger.

That man paid a fine and did community service as punishment.

Now a year after they were built, the Forest Service says the cement tubs need to be destroyed.

"People don't realize it's illegal to construct those structures that he built there," said Erickson.

Erickson is not the only who feels the tubs need to go. A spokesman for the Shoshone-Paiute Indian tribe says the hot springs are sacred, and are being misused with alcohol, drugs and sex.

"Hot springs are a place where people go for healing and prayer, ceremonies," said Ted Howard, Shoshone-Paiute cultural resource director.

Many we spoke with agree the hot springs are sacred, but they think the tubs should be kept the way they are. They commend the man who built them.

"He had to pay community service as if this wasn't the biggest community service this guy could have done. They guy should have some kind of monument and to be recognized down here," said Toby Simpson.

"When you heard these pools maybe leaving maybe gone what did you think about that?" asked NewsChannel 7.

"It almost made me cry," said Brandt Seefeldt.

Now Brandt Seefeldt and Mary Hildreth are gathering support to keep the pools intact. They say the public should have a say on what happens to them.

"The conversation should be now. And the ideas to improve something that already exists is -- A, more cost effective, and B, more logical than ripping it down and maybe starting a new," said Seefeldt.

"What people are essentially asking me to do is ignore management of the forest and meeting our regulations," said Erickson.

After the tubs are destroyed, the Forest Service says that might be the time to have that discussion on what can be done to develop this area.

The tubs will be destroyed in the near future.

Those who want the tubs to stay are trying to get legal help.

----------------------
It is not uncommon for people to use tarps and rocks to make impromptu pools near hot springs in Idaho's forests. But a man - who officials with the U.S. Attorney's office refuse to identify - used mortar and rocks to make a series of permanent pools on the riverbank. It was done without permission from the Boise National Forest or the Shoshone-Paiute Tribe, which would have had to be consulted for the work to be approved.

"We have highly developed structures that were made illegally," Boise National Forest spokesman Dave Olson said. "District Ranger (John Erickson) felt that (it) was unauthorized, illegal use of the land. (Representatives of) the Shoshone-Paiute also became aware of this work and became concerned about it."

Boise National Forest officials say the man who built the pools eventually paid a fine and served community service.





Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:42:12 PM)


XI has asked me very politely in the past to not post articles in their entirety due to copyright laws...

And so "cherry pick" I must.

Its odd that you would try to condemn me for it though, especially since I clearly posted all the pertinent links for you to freely click on.







mnottertail -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:45:48 PM)

I understand, but in your cherry picking and your subject, you have changed the entire viewpoint of what happened, this was not a result of indian religious fundamentalists, this was about the LAW in NATIONAL FORESTS, IN NATIONAL WATERS.

So, gertie and bertie are pissed off, so fuckin what? what about the other 300 mill or so people who own that?

Ron




ModeratorEleven -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:46:01 PM)

I didn't ask you to selectively choose excerpts to attempt to support your own position and ignore those that blow it out of the water.  If you're going to troll, at least be honest about your motives.

XI





Sanity -> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds (10/23/2009 12:48:40 PM)


Which parts would you like to see posted that I omitted?

What in either of those articles changes anything.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875