Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Only very few planes are so equipped. It became an issuey (word invention again, sue me) thing after 9/11 of course. Remote flying an aircraft presents the same problems as remote driving a car, just to a much greater degree. But it can and has been done. For one, as bad as my eyesight is, most cameras are still worse, and it is harder to get yourself "into the space" so to speak. I mean you can put twenty cameras in the car and twenty monitors on someone's desk, but they are still going to have a hell of a time just to paralell park. Actually I inadvertently pulled a decent metaphor here, because taking off and landing can be considered "parking" in a way. It is by far the most difficult aspect of remote flying. There is a certain amount of "feel" involved. Regular autopilot is not the same thing. That just keeps the plane on it's heading and maintains altitude. Let's hope some big mountains don't come up, so to speak. So in reality, even today a pilot is mainly need to takeoff and land. On a longer flight they can indeed just set it on auto until a course correction is needed or for takeoff and landing. They actually can catch a few Zs in between. But they are supposed to wake up and do their job when required. I guess these guys didn't. We already know that the military sometimes uses drones for recom missions, but they are generally after a good bombing. Surface to air defenses should already be taken out so there are generally no surprises. However they are not trusted to do the actual bombing usually and forget about a dogfight. There is no interface in the world efficient and accurate enough for an actual dogfight in the air, although they would love to have it. When maneuvering in a dogfight pilots experience tremendous G forces that can cause unconciousness. If they could effectively remote control a fighter jet under those circumstance it would be a tremendous advantage. We could just about have an army of video gamers. I don't think there would be any need for the draft to say the least. Don't get me wrong, flight simulators are very sophisticated, and actually could display in such a way to give the operator alot of feedback, but effectively gathering the information to display is the problem. What's more just like remote driving can't see a guy with a white cane coming up to a crosswalk, there are certain things technology simply can't do as of yet for remote flying. You can bet your ass they are working on those problems though. There is research on virtual reality going on all over the place, and that is a big part of the whole thing. Now there's something you can believe without proof. However for proof of something like this, you don't need Alex Jones and snopes (seem to be like yin and yang eh ?), look into academia. Find the keywords and start Googling and on any given Saturday you could stumble across something pertinent that has not YET been classified. Unmanned planes are called drones, but that is not enough, you'll need more words in the search string unless you have a hell of alot of time on your hands. Now back to the point in the OP, they were supposedly talking about work issues ? They who ? There was more than one person in the cockpit then ? So that would mean that all of them were either asleep or really not paying attention. For all we know they could have been having some fun with a sexy stewardess. T
|