RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

sirsholly -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 3:03:21 AM)

quote:

I think with HIPPA laws alone, this should absolutely be unacceptable.
it has to be...hell, HIPPA is so tough even the pharmacy i go to cannot announce your prescription is ready any longer. They now just use your initials over the loudspeaker.



SilverMark -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 4:21:24 AM)

Erections lead to penis growth........Mine should be 4 feet long....it's not!.....I ama amazed how all of this relates.....Dr Patient confidentiallity to HIPPA....to penis growth...and I had no idea women needed to have orgasms for health....I think it's time for all you lovely ladies to get healthy!....line forms here------->[sm=sex.gif]



tazzygirl -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 4:26:29 AM)

It doesnt relate SM, except in the neanderthal mind of a male who believes women are inferior.



sirsholly -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 4:29:19 AM)

quote:

Erections lead to penis growth........Mine should be 4 feet long....it's not!..
psssttt...if it is even close, we need to talk [:)]



OrionTheWolf -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 6:02:01 AM)

This comment is either born from ignorance, or zealotry.

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Prostate surgery would be needed to save a life. An abortion would be just the opposite.



sirsholly -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 6:21:14 AM)

quote:

I think with HIPPA laws alone, this should absolutely be unacceptable..
yanno...if by some nearly non-existent chance that this does happen, it is only right that the name of the father be publicized as well.



OrionTheWolf -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 6:23:04 AM)

~FR~

Does anyone else ever wish that some of these discussions were happen in a pub or cafe? You know, where you are face to face with the people that make some of these comments?



sirsholly -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 6:28:44 AM)

[sm=couch.gif] it's safer here



tazzygirl -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 9:18:43 AM)

i often do Master Orion, sometimes a look can say so much more than words, and some people wouldnt be able to hide their balls quite as well

~grins



barelynangel -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 11:50:08 AM)

i don't believe the doctor will be required to give the names of anyone to the Department of health and the DOH won't be publishing names of the patients.  The form is an anonymous form submitted to the DOH.  Unfortunately if they note this information even anonymous info separately per person it will be identifiable in smal towns etc. 

Even so, i think this is complete BS, i can see if the patient CHOOSES to participate and fills out the form with full disclosure as to what she is filling out and submitting to the DOH, but it being REQUIRED?  Hell no.  And my question is what about minors?  I don't know if they need parental consent to have an abortion nowadays, but they damn well do need parental concent to having ANY information released about them to any place,  As someone else noted, in a small town little information could go along way especially with speculation.  I hope this gets slapped down quickly and noted for its BS.

In the end, this isn't about abortion, this is about the rights and privacy of the patients who seek legal medical treatments being exploited for their choices.

angel



kittinSol -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 12:38:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

The article says that there are penalties for not providing the information.  But it doesn't mention what the penalties are for providing the WRONG information.  If I were a doctor in OK, I'd have an inexplicable computer glitch that entered the wrong data that somehow matched the wives of cosponsors Lamb and Sullivan.  And claim HIPPA confidentiality when they demanded to see the original records.



I forgot to say this last night, Steven, but I think that would be the only fair and ethical route to take.



servantforuse -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 7:22:28 PM)

The one eyed snake has a natural attraction to the bearded clam.



tazzygirl -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 7:53:00 PM)

pft... they are rare around these parts, pardner



FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: So much for Dr-patient confidentiality (10/25/2009 11:38:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly
quote:

I think with HIPPA laws alone, this should absolutely be unacceptable..
yanno...if by some nearly non-existent chance that this does happen, it is only right that the name of the father be publicized as well.
I agree...  This of course comes with the additional stigma for girls who are not monogamous, or in a monogamous relationship.   The lady in question would still have a bigger social problem.    M



Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125