OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
I am not sure where I read it, but it was something along the lines of "the best man to be President is the one smart enough to do the job, and smart enough to not want it." The reward to being ethical is an internal reward, and I agree that very few people, much less politicians, have that. I have been organizing things locally because of certain community concerns, and someone the other night said I should run for a county commisioner position. I told them there is no way in hell I would do that. They asked didn't I want to help the community, and I said sure, and that is why I am staying a member of it. This Ethics Committee is a reflection of some of the worst things in our "elected servants", as they give the appearance of maintaining ethics, when they are just a way for politicians to CYA. I am not sure what it is going to take in this country for a political revolt to occur, but it needs to happen while we still have something left in the vaults to work with. The USSR destroyed itself from the inside, like a cancer, and I see our political system has a cancer as well, just a different form of cancer. No Ethics Committee is going to cure it. quote:
ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales quote:
What happened? I was told this was the topic about the Ethics Committee. Come on now, politicians and ethics rarely go together anyway. ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf The problem is, that our political system is not set up to reward ethics. You have a better chance of getting an ethical hereditary monarch than you do an ethical elected leader.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|