OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
The area of Matthew that was being discussed, is where Jesus clarifies that it is not just the deed, but the intent that is important. He states that he is not there to change any of the laws or the teachings of the profits. He calls out the Pharisees on what they have done, using technicalities to determine right and wrong, but disregarding intent. He pretty much goes through several of the major laws, and clarifies them for their intent. He does not change any of those laws. That is what my comment was about. Anyone being born changes the world, if even a little. To clarify even further, look into when the NT was actually written and put into cannon. The process by which it was done, and how much that was left out, that until that time had been included. Then look into the "Last" apostle, Paul, digging deeply into historical accounts of who Paul was. Then after all of that, ask yourself why ever would the God of Abraham give commands that are impossible to follow. Once you come to this area, turn right at the translations and start looking more to the metaphore, context and audience each sermon was held in. Paul has more of an impact on modern Christianity, than the teachings of Jesus, and sorry but Paul is not always echoing what Jesus taught. In fact Hebrews and a few other books would be considered heretical, based upon the primitive Christian teachings, so if Paul is to be kept in te fold and his authority recognized, certain things must change. And poor Peter, who is the foundation of the church, the one that was supposed to inherit the "church" was left where, doing what? Modern rationalizations of the primitive text are done so that more people can be drawn to a religion, that was never actually meant for the gentiles. quote:
ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark OriontheWolf posted - quote:
Now do not forget that Jesus did not change anything, he merely fullfilled and clarified things. Also, take into account that he is actually not the most influentual person that had a bearing on how the bible was written, or translated. Now, I would disagree that Jesus did not change anything. The very fact he 'existed' means that christianity exists. So there was a change. I would be interested in others opinions. Now whilst I get that there will be non christian responses with the usual 'it's just a story' slant that I really do understand - I'm not looking for authentication. I am interested in ideas that surround what myth or reality (you work with what you believe) of Jesus examples - brought change. Now, I am also interested in the idea that Jesus was not the most influential person on the writings and translations. Who do you believe were, who were they and why do you believe it? Thanks in advance. the.dark.
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|