Celeste43 -> RE: So very disappointed (3/15/2006 9:26:52 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash Although I am not privy to any more information than what the OP offered, I didn't assume they were meeting for a play period. If so, then I agree that the first meeting perhaps should have been more like a first date, depending on of course the distance involved and perhaps how long they had been conversing. As for the date like normal (I hate that term), utilizing the internet as your meeting media doesn't always allow that, due to the distance barrier. The dating ritual in many cases has to be done on-line and then it's a leap of faith, because that first meeting may be THE meeting. This is what makes it tougher, you can't do the "normal" thing, you don't get that walk in the park, or that coffee. Sure, social skills are needed, but they ARE quite different when dealing with long distance relationships that have the underlying potential to go real time. If they are local, then I agree, treat it as any other local date, but I believe that is rarely the case when you have met on-line. Sorry I disagree. Expecting someone who never laid eyes on you before to show up at your house and be your slave is inappropriate. We were living 150 miles apart when we met. We met for coffee and that went well so we went down the road to a diner and had breakfast. That went well so we got some picnic stuff and spent the rest of the day at the beach. At no point did he have unreal expectations such as immediate play. As it happened by the end of the day we were in a quiet corner of the parking lot necking in the car but if either of us had felt no chemistry or that we were not the same people we had talked to for a month before meeting, then we would have ended it then and there. We had hopes but not unreal expectations and that is the difference.
|
|
|
|