RE: Glen isnt a "hoot"

RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Loki45 -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 10:51:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Im a freakin sadist Loki....its what I do, are you the thought police now? telling me I cant dream of doing nasty things to a nasty person. Or do you just have a problem with female sadists??... grow up. As if Im gonna end up beating him into a snivelling puddle,sheesh Ill enjoy my nasty little fantasies thankyou [sm=fingers.gif] I don't need to be the 'thought police' I just went by what you said. I just find it interesting that your first thought runs to violence just because someone says something you don't like, yet if a man were to say something similar, women would call that a 'red flag' and label the man an abuser.

Lucylastic -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 11:44:42 AM)
Well I have never found your thoughts interesting. I just thought I would make that clear... your misogyny is well known and laughed about... a sad little joke. If I send up a red flag to you , then I am eternally grateful.

Loki45 -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 11:53:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Well I have never found your thoughts interesting. Outstanding. Because I don't give one rat's ass what you think of my thoughts. quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic your misogyny is well known Excellent. Then all my effort isn't going to waste. Thank you. quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic laughed about... a sad little joke. Funny, I often think the same of you and yours. You're a constant source of entertainment for me.

slvemike4u -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 12:32:50 PM)
Lucy...could you send me back my copy of "How to Win Friends and Influence People".....thanks.[:D]

Lucylastic -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 12:38:22 PM)
snorts BUT do you think he got the point[;)]...thats what I really wanna know..actually nah dont care either way.... The book is a little stained, Ill send you a new copy[:D]

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 1:14:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery The link is there. It's even easy to find. See the orange type? I don't like to present blog pieces as news. Note I even avoided the word "article." It is, as I said, interesting snippets. No claim beyond that. Got any thoughts on the content? Or just content to slam the very idea of posting? I also see that it was edited after my post. I have not thoughts on the content, since I know nothing about GB and couldnt care less about him or what people think of him. The blog itself is just typical venemous double standard crap that prevails for "opinion" on the net.

Musicmystery -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 1:20:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery The link is there. It's even easy to find. See the orange type? I don't like to present blog pieces as news. Note I even avoided the word "article." It is, as I said, interesting snippets. No claim beyond that. Got any thoughts on the content? Or just content to slam the very idea of posting? I also see that it was edited after my post. Yes, but the link was there just the same, at the time of your post. quote: I have not thoughts on the content, since I know nothing about GB and couldnt care less about him or what people think of him. The blog itself is just typical venemous double standard crap that prevails for "opinion" on the net. Sure, it's an opinion piece. At least it offers an argument, however, rather than an out of hand dismissal.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 1:23:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery The link is there. It's even easy to find. See the orange type? I don't like to present blog pieces as news. Note I even avoided the word "article." It is, as I said, interesting snippets. No claim beyond that. Got any thoughts on the content? Or just content to slam the very idea of posting? I also see that it was edited after my post. Yes, but the link was there just the same, at the time of your post. quote: I have not thoughts on the content, since I know nothing about GB and couldnt care less about him or what people think of him. The blog itself is just typical venemous double standard crap that prevails for "opinion" on the net. Sure, it's an opinion piece. At least it offers an argument, however, rather than an out of hand dismissal. An argument that has no basis isnt an argument.

Musicmystery -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 1:26:20 PM)
A minute ago you knew nothing about GB. Now you know whether the argument has basis. I'm not sticking up for it necessarily--I didn't research it either, and don't particularly care to anymore than you. It's an interesting point of view, with supported points. Time for fact checks, perhaps. But hardly "no basis."

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 3:19:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery A minute ago you knew nothing about GB. Now you know whether the argument has basis. I'm not sticking up for it necessarily--I didn't research it either, and don't particularly care to anymore than you. It's an interesting point of view, with supported points. Time for fact checks, perhaps. But hardly "no basis." I didnt say his argument had no basis, I dont waste my time reading blogs. I was responding to your proposition that putting forth an argument is, in and of itself, somehow better than an out of hand dismissal.

Musicmystery -> RE: Glen isnt a "hoot" (11/28/2009 3:22:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy An argument that has no basis isnt an argument. quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy I didnt say his argument had no basis You seem to have. ??? quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy I dont waste my time reading blogs. I was responding to your proposition that putting forth an argument is, in and of itself, somehow better than an out of hand dismissal. Fair enough on the first point. On the second, you dismissed it with a "claim" of your own, quote: The blog itself is just typical venemous double standard crap that prevails for "opinion" on the net. also fair enough, but an unsupported position on your part, just a dismissal. That's not to say you couldn't have built a case (for those black/white thinkers out there), just noting we have nothing but your gut feelings without regard to content. Also fair enough, but hardly the same.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125