CelticSubM
Posts: 102
Joined: 3/12/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vixenkneels ...The subject matter of the photo was not distasteful in the least...a man holding an INFANT in his arms. It's not the poses in the photo that offend me; it's the concept of displaying a child under the age of 18 on a website like this. I'm not suggesting the profile be deleted; I'm suggesting the photo be deleted and the profile holder be informed of CM's AUP/TOS. Again, I find it difficult to comprehend what is objectionable. Honi soit qui mal y pense. If anything, it seems to me very healthy that people on sites like this should present themselves as well-rounded persons, as family members, members of a community, people who engage in normal activities. To me, it seems a bit of a stretch to interpret CM's Terms of Service as prohibiting any incidental, secondary representation of minors, even in the most innocuous settings. Of course, that's not my choice to make, or yours. If CM management choose to take that position, I'd find it bizarre, but it wouldn't bother me. That's their prerogative. I don't see this as a major issue one way or another. No one is going to stop using this site because she saw a picture of a guy holding his kid. People will stop using this site if they begin to think it's mostly scammers, spammers and commercial listings.
|