AnimusRex
Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006 Status: offline
|
I don't think it is cheaper, first off; but that is only a secondary issue. One of the most important thing we do in a democracy is keep civilian control of the military. Contracting out the job of going to war does three harmful things- One, it severs the chain of accountability- everything the contractor does is shrouded in secrecy; the contractors are not held to the military code of conduct, and not accountable to the laws of the host nation. For instance, in Bosnia, there were very credible accounts of DynCorp contractors keeping a borthel of child prostitutes, really ugly stuff, yet none were ever investigated or prosecuted; they existed in a law-free zone where they acted with impunity. Second, there is a serious problem with perverse disincentives; the contractor has a perverse incentive to make the war a stalemate, not to achieve victory. In addition, if they fight for money, who is to prevent them from being paid a dollar more to subvert the goals of the government? Iran and India, for instance, would love for us to end up with forces fighting in Afghanistan for a century, bogged down in a stalemate that weakens American and India's arch-rival, Pakistan. Third, there is the problem with the separation of the cost of war from the citizens who benefit from it. What isn't being discussed a lot, if that only a minority of the military contractors in Iraq/ Afghanistan are American citizens; most are foreign nationals, from poor contries making good money fighting our wars. This has always been an Achilles heel of mercenary forces- Ancient Rome used foreign fighters and had the same problem. This separated the making of war from its price tag. Citizens are not being asked to pay a price for going to war, so going to war becomes a tempting way to solve all problems- it makes diplomacy, coalition building, and forging alliances the second strategy, not the first. This becomes a long term losing proposition, since endless warmaking ends up bankrupting the nation that does it. War is the one part of government we really don't need or even want to be cost-effective; we want it to accomplish very limited goals, regardless of the cost.
|