Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

An inconvenient question for Algore


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> An inconvenient question for Algore Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 3:06:12 PM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline 		A journalist was trying to ask Gore about those leaked emails indicating fraud in global warming charges. Gore said that the newest email was two years old. The reporter asked Gore if he would like to change his answer considering the fact that the newest leaked email was actually two weeks, not years, old. Gore refused to answer and a UN security guard grabbed the reporters mic and yanked out the cord.


An Inconvenient Question For Algore


_____________________________

"Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable." Sidney J. harris
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 3:09:21 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		I read the hacked emails.  They date from 2 months to 10 years.   I noted that right away.

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 3:28:54 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		If a person is moving from A-B and A or B happens to be a place where questions are permitted from all directions and news organisations why would anyone tolerate the person being held up along the way by one person??? (look three question marks)

People that keep going on about these emails that form a fraction of the total science into climate change are intentionally trying to limit the debate to one area. Who I ask is foolish enough that they can't see this obvious ploy? I thought I was this normal average person with average perceptions but it turns out instead I am this super genius, like rule, because I seem to see something as obvious and others around me don’t.


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 3:35:43 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		East Anglia had the key funding contract.  A handful of scientists stated in the emails they did not want their name on the published paper.

Unless you read them- it is hard to speculate what was said. 

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 3:44:04 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		It's irrelevant even if they did lie and it was proven. (which it wasn't)

If there was a one thousand page book on the subject of climate change the work of these people would account for about twenty pages of it, if that.

This idea you put about of some grand conspiracy is being hyped by the oil lobby amoungst others who want the status quo. Obvious.

Do you still believe smoking is good for you and doesn't cause cancer? This is that all over again, very similar in modus operandi.

What is really sad is that you highlight all these obscure grand conspiracies but you can’t see the obvious ones in front of you.


< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 12/16/2009 3:48:31 PM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 3:46:48 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3


If there was a one thousand page book on the subject of climate change the work of these people would account for about twenty pages of it, if that.




This is utter bullshit. Their findings and the secondary use of them are at the core of most of the global warming hysteria.

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 3:57:43 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		Yeah because to the ignorant the idea of global warming only came about yesterday didn't it?

Do some research before making such idiotic statements, East Anglia isn't even a redbrick university it only opened in the 1960's. This idea that it invented the concept of Climate Change which every other educational institution around the world follows is utter bollocks.

You are being disingenuous at best.


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 4:19:20 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		Here you go lil one a brief history of the field:

You might see the term 'Victorian' crop up a few times.

http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm


< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 12/16/2009 4:21:04 PM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 4:42:33 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

It's irrelevant even if they did lie and it was proven. (which it wasn't)

If there was a one thousand page book on the subject of climate change the work of these people would account for about twenty pages of it, if that.

This idea you put about of some grand conspiracy is being hyped by the oil lobby amoungst others who want the status quo. Obvious.

Do you still believe smoking is good for you and doesn't cause cancer? This is that all over again, very similar in modus operandi.

What is really sad is that you highlight all these obscure grand conspiracies but you can’t see the obvious ones in front of you.



No one is stopping you from picking up litter on the highway.

Keep your hands off my wallet.

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 4:43:08 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

Yeah because to the ignorant the idea of global warming only came about yesterday didn't it?

Do some research before making such idiotic statements, East Anglia isn't even a redbrick university it only opened in the 1960's. This idea that it invented the concept of Climate Change which every other educational institution around the world follows is utter bollocks.

You are being disingenuous at best.




ROFL. How long do you think AGW theory has been around? You do know that in the 70s that the hype was fear of an ice age, right?

And who said they "invented" AGW? I said that there work and secondary use of it is a very large component of AGW theory. It is.

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 4:46:15 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		then WHY was the raw data destroyed?

It was so important they did not even keep it.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 4:47:11 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

then WHY was the raw data destroyed?

It was so important they did not even keep it.



I assume that was a FR to another post. The raw data was destroyed because it doesnt support AGW, obviously.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 4:51:32 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

then WHY was the raw data destroyed?

It was so important they did not even keep it.



I assume that was a FR to another post. The raw data was destroyed because it doesnt support AGW, obviously.


They want a 20% global carbon tax on everything we consume.  So - if this is so very important- that proof would be more available then news about Tiger Woods.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 5:42:53 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3
I am this super genius, like rule, because I seem to see something as obvious and others around me don’t.


I sure hope you're not like rule......he believes in unicorns

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 5:43:31 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Al Gore has never had the balls to debate his position on global warming. Now he refuses to answer any questions. He is a phony..

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 5:51:55 PM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline 		When Al Gore is doing interviews I'm sure he'll answer all the questions; this is no big deal. Another thing George Bush answered all his questions? John McCain answered all his questions? Sarah Palin answered all her questions?

So when is Sarah going to debate Al Gore about climate change exactly?

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 5:58:44 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Al Gore will only do interviews when those asking the questions agree with him. Let me know when he goes on FOX for his interview. He recently blew up when someone from (very liberal) Madison, Wi. asked him about the over population of polar bears.

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 6:46:09 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Al Gore ... He is a phony..


No.  He's a whore. 

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/16/2009 6:53:39 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		I don't know of to many whores that have made $ 100 million for their line of B S. Maybe I should be selling carbon credits. What a load of crappy crap crap....

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: An inconvenient question for Algore - 12/17/2009 12:06:29 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Al Gore has never had the balls to debate his position on global warming. Now he refuses to answer any questions. He is a phony..



NAIL. HEAD.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> An inconvenient question for Algore Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094