AAkasha -> RE: Would you give up your career for submission? (3/18/2006 10:01:26 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy quote:
ORIGINAL: MHOO314 Well not to steal Aakasha's thread, but I am going to disagree--for Myself and a few other Dommes I know that are close to Me--for Myself---I wasn't looking for someone that "matched My income"--first of all that is very hard to do as I am one of those high earning Dommes you referred to--so I knew there was a good chance of financial disparity--the subs I met who could, were arrogant blowhards that were more "trophy boys" than a real submissive ( not making a sweeping generalization here guys--calm down)---I do not equate income with self worth--I do not equate a career with income-- Now given that--currently My boy has a job, he has his own company--it is something he likes to do, he is good at it--and it affords him the opportunity to make his own hours--mind you that freedom allowed him to be on-line at normal times to seek a Domme--for which I am extremely grateful <smiles>--unless he works 24/7 and grows that business to many employees, he will not match My income--that is not the point--My need, My desire is that when he moves with Me, he can continue with his business--he "contributes" something-- he continues to do what he likes and he indeed provides the market a valuable service--but I need him to attend to Me--to My house, My life--contributes because in the blink of an eye, I could be unemployed--but everyone in My home contributes---My teen started working at 14---So I am quite happy with the way things are--when he is with Me as he just was, we spend a tad more, when I am with him, we do things at home--he cooks, cares for Me--that IMHEO is priceless and valuable. I'd also like to add, that your theory at least here in the US is a tad outdated----today in the US in middle income families----25% see the woman working and the man " Mr Mom"--at home caring for the kids etc---in the blink of an eye--"roles" get reversed-- layoffs are a daily occurence and most middle class families live one paycheck away from bankruptcy---I get testy when someone makes "earning an income in a relationship" gender specific--- Now to Aakasha's question--I want My boy to "contribute", I want him to continue his business when he gets here--he likes it, he's good at it, it's needed--BUT I need him with Me--to help, to serve, to attend---in a NY second I could be killed and he would need to go on--no matter how massive life insurance is--it won't last long. So I elect to "carry" in your words, not Mine, I elect to build a life and a family-(oh and My Dad died 40 years ago and My Mom developed a substantial income, in a time when that just wasn't done)---but we had to survive--and I applaud My sisters who are quite ok with working while their men take care of the house duties--and btw--My three Domme friends feel the same way---their boys work--either organizing and managing the house and chores, or act as admins--and we are all quite happy--- IMHEO. We've kind of had this discussion before wherein you would say, "vanilla women are idiots." Clearly you and Akasha see the benefits of departing from the Sarah Miller doctrine, but contra to your and Akasha's examples (which is not to negate them) I've seen and know women who regularly write off guys who don't have the "right job" and who in fact compromise their own personal and love criterea items in favor of seducing and marrying high earners. As we discussed in PMs a while back, it was like these ladies wanted a lifestyle out of their man and intimacy out of their girlfriends. It was a freaky world to me. Still, Akasha's question is not one many men will have to answer, because in most households one income is not enough (85% I'd say) and because the Sarah Miller view predominates. Of course, MH, you are exceptional. I guess when I rethink it, I do come closer to cloudboy's stereotype in that I did judge/evaluate my man based on some financial/career criteria. He didn't have any money, but I did consider whether or not he was employable and had earning potential. If he did not, I would not have dated him. I knew that he had earning potential that was unlimited based on his degree and abilities. Those criteria though have more to do with someones intellect and ambition. My partner is someone who doesn't have to work at a job. My partner is in no way lazy and does not have a lazy bone in his body. If he were lazy, he wouldn't be here. He possess qualities that make it "ok" for him to not have a job, and these qualities to me are mandatory. They are: * He has a need to grow intellectually and be challenged * He has a need to be in service to a greater good or be a contributor (beyond just to me) * He does not possess a slacker mentality in any way What this means is that when he DOES have free time (we have no kids, so yes, he does often get things done and have time to spare) he isn't sleeping in late, playing video games or chatting online all day. He is reading books about business, philosophy and religion, or trade magazines so he can digest the information and be a resource for me. He's doing something healthy which I encourage him to do as much as possible: mountain biking, cycling or working out. Or, he's volunteering -- which right now because my current client is such that I don't demand much of his time -- he volunteers 20+ hours a week to a worthy cause that we both support. He can cut back those hours at any time and often does, but it's important to me that when given the choice between loafing in his free time and volunteering, he's volunteering his time. (and before any of the naysayers chime in, no, we don't make any money off of it, and the write-off is so small we don't bother). I respect when a man says he would not want to give up his job/career because it gives him mental stimulation, somewhere that he can acheive goals and a sense of worth and self esteem. I would be concerned if a man did not say these things. The reality is that one can acheive these things as long as he is self motivated and has good self discipline. For me, personally, if I were not allowed to work I would have a very hard time staying focussed on tasks at hand and would be prone to being lazy. I have to either be overacheiving at a career with very specific goals and projects or I want to lounge and do nothing. If I were independently wealthy I would put myself into a volunteerism structure that operated much like a "real job" so that I did not get into a bad sleeping pattern, stuck online all day or blowing things off like exercise. Akasha
|
|
|
|