Elisabella -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 9:02:23 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NihilusZero quote:
ORIGINAL: Elisabella That would only be the case if his posts weren't about himself. If his posts are all about himself, his beliefs, his desires, he's giving enough autobiographical information to be criticized for his beliefs rather than just his posts. I've just made a cursory look-over as far as threads he's started. Only one of them was phrased specifically about him. The others didn't strike me as "about him" any more than any thread where a person is obviously floating a thought out there because of having had a personal experience with it (I'm pretty sure most of the threads here are started anecdotally). And, unless he's been talking about anything that specifically involves a non-consenting party, I don't see where any substance can be mounted to support an attack on beliefs. Well in my opinion it depends on if the attack is a value judgement or an assumption. For example if I were to say "You're a misogynist and I find that disgusting" then it's a value judgement based on something he said about himself ("I hate women") and I'm the kind of person that doesn't see anything inherently wrong with "judging" people. However if someone said something like "it's obvious your mother didn't love you enough" then that's a flawed assumption and I agree there's no substance to support it.
|
|
|
|