Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Top 10 Fox News FAILS of 2009


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Top 10 Fox News FAILS of 2009 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Top 10 Fox News FAILS of 2009 - 12/20/2009 6:10:27 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
I would have never guessed that Brain's main news sources were MSNBC and PBS.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Top 10 Fox News FAILS of 2009 - 12/20/2009 6:38:51 PM   
MarsBonfire


Posts: 1034
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
Actually, I remember a few mistakes on MSNBC... the difference is, once they were notified of their mistakes, they issued retractions/corrections as needed. FOX however... never apologized for squat. (After all, they must maintain their image as being the infallible "ministry of information.") Not for the 120% BS, not for all the faking of teabagger protest attendance, not for promoting events from behind the curtains, all the while claiming "these are grass roots events"... (thus leading to the term "astroturf.")

Face it. FOX NEWS sucks the sweat off a dead man's balls when it comes to being "fair and balanced."

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Top 10 Fox News FAILS of 2009 - 12/20/2009 10:29:43 PM   
mcbride


Posts: 333
Joined: 1/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

~ FR ~

This is from 2004, but the findings were a surprise...

While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times. The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left. Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media. Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left.

These are just a few of the surprising findings from a UCLA-led study, which is believed to be the first successful attempt at objectively quantifying bias in a range of media outlets and ranking them accordingly.



Maybe not. As I told someone else, it might be helpful to Google a peek at reaction to that UCLA study.  You'll find some troubling questions about the methodology, from a variety of academic and non-academic sources, some of which note that the two authors "have previously received funding from the three premier conservative think tanks in the United States". There's a good analysis from what I think is a relatively balanced source here.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 23
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Top 10 Fox News FAILS of 2009 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047