NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AnimusRex I have to admit I am skeptical about nuclear power, but not for the usual reasons. I do agree that the disposal problem hasn't really been solved, but there is a deeper problem. There are two sides to resource issues- either reducing consumption, or increasing production. Neither one is a panacea, but I have the most trouble accepting the notion that the answer is to simply produce more of it. I say this because what is often neglected is the understanding that human desire is infinite, our ability to consume is literally limitless. Lets say that we found a perfect energy source- free, unlimited, nonpolluting, safe. What happens next is that the cost of every item on the planet drops, because embedded in every car, desk, apple, inside every service and product made, is the cost of energy. When energy becomes free, we will consume more of it. The cheaper it is, the more we will consume. In consuming more energy, more products, more services, we will in the process consume more forests, waste more food, mine more steel, scour the oceans ever deeper for yet more of the already depleted schools of fish.... There is no limit to our demands, no end to our insatiable hunger for more, more more. There is that story of wolves that find a sheep pen, and following their natural desire to chase and kill, end up going mad, slaughtering vast numbers of sheep, far more than they can ever eat, since they have no natural mechanism to stop. Or the buffalo hunters, who when faced with the vast herds of bison, slaughtered them by the thousands, only taking the tongues, leaving the rest of the carcasses to rot. That will be us, once we reach the consumer nirvana of free anything. Have we as a species every shown any self-restraint, any sobriety or modesty when we are faced with infinite riches and limitless wealth? Has making something free ever resulted in it being used wisely and prudently? While I don't necessarily disagree, but you are ignoring that free energy, does in fact make recycling nearly everything an economically viable business whereas now, most recycling activities must be subsidized to break even, as the cost of fuel to collect, energy to sort, energy to break into component parts, etc... is expensive moreso than mining, or making new. Also, free energy, would allow much much greater utilization of available land, and resources. Like for example, fresh water for everyone is trivial with free inexhaustible energy. Things like space flight become feasible for most if not all people. So, given the size of the solar system, if not the galaxy, if not the universe. I have to say that while technically, you might be right, I think if we could have free inexhaustible energy the time frame for reaching that limit is very far off. Unless we just kept doing everything the same as an energy constrained planet.
|