DesFIP -> RE: new definition of slave (12/28/2009 5:35:14 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NihilusZero quote:
ORIGINAL: Justme696 you mean a sub? Not really. His quick definition gives the implication that the yielding ("of rights") is happening in a comprehensive manner, in which case "slave" is more applicable than "sub". In your opinion. In mine, it's a good definition of a sub. And his definition does not state categorically that she lays aside all rights at the same time. Because damn few would be willing to sign over the deed to their house, ownership of their firms, sign away inheritances, children's college funds etc. And if that's what is required to be categorically and comprehensively then none of us are slaves except those who don't have anything worth losing.
|
|
|
|