|
NihilusZero -> RE: Misogyny and BDSM (1/7/2010 2:56:22 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23
And you are really confused as to whether I was calling your name, or using the phrase "Bull" as it is commonly used all of the time all across our fair country?
I don't get it. What's the joke? Because if you're not joking, you're fucking stupid on a truly impressive level, and if you are joking, this is utterly witless and not funny.
4.0
Functions more as just a declaration of what was said rather than an actual counterattack. Granted, this is at the tail end of counter-playing the receiver's attempt to double entendre his username into the battle royale. Incorporating previous comments about that into this final move, I'd score the combination at more of a 6.1.
quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx
I don't suppose you do, but it sure is fun watching you chase your tail.
2.8
Kind of a going to the well once too often. The double entendre trick as an entrance was good, but it wears out if used as the continuing basis for subsequent prods. If I was going to incorporate the entire "bull" collection together, I'd put it at 5.2.
quote:
ORIGINAL: EbonyWood
I'm momentarily and intermittently diverted by the protestations of an asshole. Now having discovered he has no wit, there is little amusement.
3.6
Indirect zings work well by virtue of the presumed detachment and the feeling of not even considering the receiver of being worthy of being dealt with directly, but there's not a lot of substance here. To combine with the swine flu comment, though, it would get pushed up to 5.9.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23
It was just so mind-boggling witless. I mean, here you are, trying to insult. You've got this nice, tight little list of five points you want to make about me. Some fair digs in there. And then...the library crack. How was I supposed to take you seriously after that? It was soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo lame.
See, me, I would have stopped at five for . And I probably wouldn't even go to five, since in comedy the rule is the Rule of Three. Two serious, then the joke. Never would I accuse someone of stealing library books as a slam, unless I was very intentionally attempting to be ironic by slamming someone in a completely ineffectual manner.
But it's funny that you think my mystification at your motives for saying something that clearly lacking in oomph is some sign that I find you attractive. You're like 10+ years in the opposite direction of what I like. If I had an issue with you, it wouldn't be do to attraction, it would be because women your age remind me of my mom, and I don't care for women who give off strong mommy vibes.
5.7
Drawn-out return fire. Strong start, actually, but loses energy as it continues and ends with an uninspiring age prod.
quote:
ORIGINAL: sexyred1
You are so funny, sweetie. I never said you STOLE the libary books (guilty of something??) I said the library said the books were overdrawn. If you think joke was lame, please make sure you cite it correctly.
Hon, your Mommy comments are lame as well. I could never be your Mommy silly, the age is not correct. If I acted like your Mommy I would be trying to placate you or..in your case, I would probably kill myself with a son like you. I can only imagine what din din is like at the Psychonut family home. Chilling imagery....I would love to know what happened between you and your Mommy and maybe Daddy, because you sure like picking on those men who verbally destroyed you.
You are sort of like Norman Bates on crack. But with more overdue library books and a really crappy parlor.
5.7
Reverse of the last mix. This time a strong middle with some sharp strikes pulled out of the stereotypical taboo drawer. The end does cleverly bring the book and parlor topics into full circle but feels incomplete or without quite the snap an ideal finish would have.
(End of Page 59)
|
|
|
|
