Mercnbeth -> RE: Collars when married to others (3/22/2006 12:29:01 PM)
|
quote:
Please let me know if you will be in the Boston or DC/Baltimore area, or if you are going to Leather Retreat, or Black Rose 06- I can introduce you to a few who've been doing it happily for years. Or if you will be in the NJ, NY, or Atlanta areas, I can give a heads up to some people I know that you can contact and see them. LA, Agree or accept, and under what consequence for not accepting? Kids, house, hell, even medical insurance, are reasons to accept. At Folsom we attended a presentation from a couple who had this situation. She was a self-professed slut. He stayed behind with the kids and maintained the house during her expeditions where she did everything to all. He would qualify for one of these examples of "agreeing". He saw three choices, let her go out and be miserable at home and worry that she would do herself harm; divorce her and unless he wanted to expose himself and his children to a messy sensationalized divorce proceeding pay child support and alimony; or join her and try to like it. From a lifestyle perspective it has a happy ending. He joined her and now he loves it too. I don't think beth and I came away from the presentation with the intended message, but it was an enlightening seminar regarding the topic we are discussing. Truesub, and this post addresses the spouse left behind, not poly and not open marriages. How many of those "agreeing" are like the example sighted? How many, as this man, base that acceptance on the fundamental truth that they love the person no matter what and this is about as "no matter what" as it can get. I'll even interject the "vows" aspect again, the "for better or worse" part. Because of that I'd disagree with BitaTruble's father-in-law "he's only human" defense. I can understand it. I wouldn't want to be in a similar position and have to make that decision, but I hope I'd be an asshole with integrity and divorce my dementia inflicted partner, paying the expenses out of my own pocket, than see my lying cheating face in the mirror every morning when I shaved. Which posses the question, did the father-in-law not divorce her because he would still be financial responsible anyway if the insurance company was left off the hook? Meanwhile, did the children get to "agree"? Not answers we really need to know, but they would be going through my mind during the decision process. However, I can be accused and I am speaking in the hypothetical as far any experience of this nature. Regarding a married partner with an agreeing partner I speak from actual experience. When I first moved to California, the opportunity came up. A married woman submissive whose husband was agreeing. I spoke with him. He was her 'safe-call' when she came to my apartment. The only thing going through my mind was him and their "unmentionable" back home. The hours we spent together were probably the longest I've gone without having ANY 'lifestyle' thoughts rummaging around in my head. Unlike where the education trends seem to be going 2+2 will always equal exactly 4. There ARE absolutes. Absolutes that should be the boundaries of doing what you want to do versus doing what you'd like to do, or have fun doing. There are thousands of justifications and reasons to rationalize doing things you want to do. It's much harder when you have absolutes, that define you, which conflict. You keep compromising your absolutes and before long you don't know what they are. Then you don't know who you are. I guess under those conditions it is impossible to fail.
|
|
|
|