sincityprincess -> RE: Differentiating between fantasy & reality (1/2/2010 7:59:43 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: UniqueRaven The thought that comes to mind for me is this: As slaves, often when we end one 24/7 relationship we try to see how we can make the next one "even better" - and fix any issues that came up during the 24/7 by essentially finding the more "perfect" Master that we know has to exist out there somewhere, if only we look hard enough. You are right. I didn't think of that before...I guess that is easy to do even in vanilla relationships. quote:
ORIGINAL: UniqueRaven Problem is, he doesn't exist. Masters are just the same as slaves, human beings with issues and moments when they don't feel particularly Masterful or even Dominant. Everyone has moments of humanity by definition. So seeking that "perfect package" in a Master isn't necessarily going to create that "perfect" 24/7 relationship of our dreams. Just isn't going to happen. And you're going to have to accept his humanity at the same time that you seek the traits that are so important to you, and you may have to trade off on some traits in order to get the ones that you need. And maybe he'll love to play video games, or go to Star Trek conventions, or go hunting, or sit and watch football on Sunday in his underpants - are you accepting that part of him too? Because those sorts of things are what come with the fantasy. And as his slave, your role is to serve and accept all of him - even when he doesn't feel like being sexually deviant or sadistic. I agree with you on all of this, as I replied to AnimusRex, I know that no one is going to REALLY want to keep me in a cage all day and all night, whip me for precisely 8 hours a day, and fuck me no less than 6 times a day. And I know that I wouldn't actually want anyone to. Unless I am hoping to find someone who also wants to fatten me up so he can make a dress out of my skin. quote:
ORIGINAL: UniqueRaven i say this all the time: If you want to be owned, you need to be something worth owning - you need to show *your* side of the value equation. Be valuable property and you might just attract an Owner who is seeking that value package that you possess. But the way i see it now is that a prospective Owner would probably just read this list and his eyes glaze over with how much work you're going to be. Just calling it like i see it. [:)] i hope this helps, julie You couldn't have hit the nail on the head any more than this. Thanks! I guess I have clearly forgotten that not only do you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar, but if you are hungry & hoping to catch a fish quit fucking with your flytrap. quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub Define too egalitarian. Some prefer dominants who wait till the relationship has start to take control and that may be the type that the person has the most experience with. You are completely right. I don't know how to define what I mean by too egalitarian...I guess just that they don't seem to take the lead even in a conversation. It is just annoying when I have to be the one to ask all the questions, keep the conversation moving, etc. quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub Some are actually quite submissive but think they are dominant. How are you coming to that judgement? Did they ask you to dominate them? It is subjective, I know this. No, they don't ask me to dominate them...I don't mean they are submissive from a "wanting to lick my boots" sort of way--more of a juxtaposition sort of way. There are plenty of interactions which occur between two people in which one person is dominant and the other is submissive. If both were just equal and middle-of-the-road, they would both have to be British. I am talking about the "I don't know? What do you want to do? I don't know, what do YOU want to do?" sort of inability of to be assertive. quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub Perhaps they can and have been holding back. If that happens often, you may want to look at the signals you are sending to them. Just playing devil's advocate. [:)] Thank you for your input. Your posts are always so well thought out and informative. Your willingness to play devil's advocate is appreciated. quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub It exists. How to craft the profile though... Just write your profile stating what you said in this post. Make it very clear the sort of activities you consider sadistic "enough" so that there isn't any chance of a mistake. If I were you, I would also talk about what you bring to the table as well, beyond a warm bottom to hit. Skills, interests, hobbies, that sort of thing. However, I do feel compelled to say, as a said in another thread recently, it's not that you are dealing with wannabes or fakes. It's that you are dealing with people, people with varying viewpoints, desires and needs. It's going to take time. The more "qualifications" you have and the less things that are flexible, as with anything in life, the harder it's going to be to find exactly what you want. I'd suggest being flexible on the age thing but it's all up to you. Best of luck. I think I am just frustrated that I live in a very small conservative religious town and my only chance of meeting someone in this lifestyle is on websites. I know that the chances of anyone meeting their future partner of any kind are slim--and the chances go down with a veritable checklist of must have's like mine. Maybe I just need to take up a hobby to keep myself occupied until I can more objectively create a profile that is reflective of who I am and what I want. Thank you!! quote:
ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23 Being very new to all of this, one of the most confusing sets of mixed messages I have received is on this issue. It's very hard to know if you're supposed to be dominant from the very first interaction, or if you're supposed to wait until some sort of cue has been given. This is real problem for me, because normally I suppress most if not all of my dominant tenancies when dealing with others, only letting them surface when it was socially appropriate to do so, such as when I was teaching and when I was working with the SPD. So my normal persona tends to be laidback, passive and observant rather than particularly aggressive. It's pretty easy for me to flip the switch, but I'm not sure when to do it re: subs, especially when I keep reading messages like this one (which seems to imply I should open with "On your knees slut!"), and reading messages where subs are saying "I ignore the idiots who open with "On your knees slut!"" It's very hard to sort this out. Wow, I am sure I have been guilty of this. I am so glad you brought that up & I will make sure I don't do that again. Thanks.
|
|
|
|