philosophy
Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: popeye1250 We should close half of our embasseys and we'd be much better off for it! ...well, that's debatable. Most US embassies exist to project US influence around the world. Closing the US embassies will just cede that influence to other countries and influence blocs. You think that Russia wouldn't think all their Xmas' had come at once if the USA ceded world influence? You think that China wouldn't be rubbing its hands with glee? The EU would see it for what is is too. A chance for every other power bloc in the world to take away from the USA the priviliged position it now holds. There's no such thing as a free ride Popeye. you know this as well as anyone. What you're suggesting would cost the US dearly. It'd be you, a taxpayer, who'd end up paying the price as trading blocs around the world walk away from the sweetheart deals the US now enjoys. The price for the position the US now enjoys in world affairs is to actually engage in them. Isolationism is, at the very best, a short term measure that'd give some US citizens a bit of a thrill. Oooh look we, the USA, can stand alone. USA, USA! Ten years down the line, as your standard of living drops and your cost of living rises, as your world influence suffers, there'd be many regrets. And don't think that there are any other nations around the world that would support a semi-isolationist stance either. Australia, UK, New Zealand, all the other english speaking nations have no desire for isolationism. They're not that stupid.
< Message edited by philosophy -- 1/7/2010 12:50:37 PM >
|