Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Termyn8or -> Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/7/2010 6:50:34 PM)

Now come the fruits of democracy in it's true form. I think in the end we will see more laws shifting, bending and morphing before people get the idea through their thick skulls why this country is not supposed to be a democracy. I think the following situation illustrates the fact no matter what your stance on smoking.

The people have now voted to allow casinos in Ohio

The people in Ohio have voted for tough anti-smoking laws

In my estimation, well over half of the people I know smoke cigaretttes. Of them most avoid going to establishments such as restaurants, I know I do. There are a few who violate this "law" and their businesses seem to be doing quite well, for example at my Father's funeral most smoked. Not at the funeral but the thing after, like the party. Well I paid for that and selected a decent bar with a party room for this event. Of course smoking was allowed. Law schmaw. Other places charge a buck to use an ashtray, and that money goes to pay the fine in case they get busted. For a commercial establishment that can be up to $1,500 I think.

So the point is we have plenty of restaurants in Ohio, and a friend of mine just got back from Chicago. I think it was in Indiana it took him a minute to realize that he could enjoy his after dinner smoke at a reastaurant. My Mother goes to casinos, get this, WITH NON-SMOKERS ! They and her will still be leaving the state to gamble elsewhere, even if there is a casino down the street. That means even friends of smokers will leave their dollars elsewhere.

I have read some of the words of the founding Fathers of this nation, and I have gleaned that their considered opinon was that democracy always seems to shoot itself in the foot. If the government can usurp your rights now, a democracy allows your neighbors to do the same. Kapeesh ?

One more thing, I have not verified this but I don't doubt it - in Ohio it is now illegal to smoke in any commercially licensed vehicle. And beware smoking travellers, like truck drivers, many others, that this applies to you when you are in Ohio. I can check, but I know this state government well enough to not really doubt it very much. Even if not true, it is possible in a "democracy", in which rights are set aside at will, it just happens to be the will of the masses. Weren't witch burnings a public event ?

So in the end we have the current situation, millions are going to be invested in an industry that will be crippled before it even starts. There are plenty of smoke filled basements in this state with high stakes poker games, craps, all that. Illegal of course, so there is no revenue for Ohio. Some will go out of state because of the non-smoking, not only no revenue for Ohio, but revenue for another state. The whole ad campaign was based on the flow of money out of Ohio. The opponents' ads were based on how much in breaks and stealing that was going to happen that the revenue wouldn't amount to shit.

The anti-smoking people would not budge an inch, their word became law, and that is the problem. More accomodating laws were proposed, and there was always the option to govern by taxation, something "they" do more than infrequently. But now the lack of accomodation for others is going to bite them right in the wallet, because that's what many people use instead of the ballot box. So consider those newly created jobs should be considered temporary. Any supportive services will enjoy a temporary expansion and then collapse under their own weight without the support of customers. I think they are cutting about one third of their market with this.

Ironically it seems, maybe the government had better judgement than the People. They have enacted laws against smoking in certain places, but never anything as draconian as this. This is going to hurt this state.

T




Real0ne -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/7/2010 10:48:56 PM)

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. ~ Winston Churchill


they do it by banning the businesses and threatening them to put them out of business.

cant wait till they start taking peoples houses n shit then they will wake up! 




Termyn8or -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/7/2010 11:08:13 PM)

Y'know, I did intend to include that.

T




pahunkboy -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 3:54:06 AM)

I am a nonsmoker.

PA has sim laws.

When we got them- tho- it did not make me start going out again.

Do you roll your own?

Because if you dont- you should consider the other gunk worse that they put it in.

Honestly I think the cigs and pills killed my buddy.  They said heart attack- but they dont always denote.

can we get rid of colognes?  

To a non-smoker- with border line breathing problems- smoke smells terrible.

A buddy of mine Bill comes over- and leaves a cloud of fumes behind.  It is too bad because they are nice people.  I purposefully wont go over there because I can not breath.

...but dont take my comments too seriously. I want to move further out and get away from people period.  Become a hermit.

This is where the net is nice. I can hang and not breath smoke- etc- dont have to worry about parking, fees, etc.

God I love the Internet.




pahunkboy -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 4:00:27 AM)

And that wanton bitch Jim- got mad at me when I put chewing gum in ash tray!!!


Nevermind that in public I put it under the chair/table!

I was good- I never stuck gum under his coffee table.   Well -not when I was sober I did not....




housesub4you -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 4:19:42 AM)

In Illinois the ban has been in place for several years, and according to the last data collected by Northwestern, the smoking ban has not caused the huge down fall of business people said it would

As for the casinos, several have closed along the IL/IN border, where none of the riverboat ones that do not allow smoking have run into trouble. 

I'm a non smoker,(I could not stand having a meal while someone at the next table smokes one after another the entire time, what about me being able to enjoy my meal with their dam smoke being in my face) the only part of the ban that I do not understand is the part about smoking outside in public areas, so people can't smoke, but those huge ass buses can spew all that green and black smoke into our faces and that is OK




eyesopened -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 5:10:57 AM)

I'm a smoker as is my Master.  We do not smoke in our home.  We live in Florida where it is illegal to smoke in "public" places.

What I would like to see challenged is the term "public".  If I open a business, if I own the property or the lease, I pay the taxes, then I fail to see how that is public.  It is a private business.  I should be able to allow any legal activity I wish within my private business.  Tobacco use is legal.  Non-smokers are not compelled to eat at restaurants, frequent bars or casinos. 

Georgia came up with a great compromise.  If an establishment allows anyone under the age of 18 to be in their place of business, smoking is banned.  If an establishment limits patrons to 18 or older, then smoke em if you got em. 

A public place should be defined as a place technically owned by the public, government buildings, city parks and the like.  Ban smoking there.  No one goes to the DMV because of the great ambience, they go because they have to.  Makes sense to ban smoking.

Now what makes the most sense is to make tobacco an illegal substance.  Any other consumer product that has been liked to as few as 10 deaths gets pulled off the market immediately!  But state and federal government loves money more than the health of its people.  Until governments stop talking out both sides of their faces on tobacco use, let people smoke or ban the substance altogether!




tazzygirl -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 5:14:11 AM)

Now what makes the most sense is to make tobacco an illegal substance. Any other consumer product that has been liked to as few as 10 deaths gets pulled off the market immediately! But state and federal government loves money more than the health of its people. Until governments stop talking out both sides of their faces on tobacco use, let people smoke or ban the substance altogether!

Then we have to look at banning alcohol again... and we all know how well that worked the first time. Besides, smoking and drinking are the two vices of politicians that no one will spin during an election.




pahunkboy -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 5:22:02 AM)

GA seems to have a good idea.

As much as I detest smoke, I also detest onerous govt.

My sister and her husband smoke- but not in their house.  I know many who set it up like this.   It really is a nice thing- I can visit her and breath. 

Odd thing.  I buy coins off of ebay- sometimes even a few coins stink-   lol.   But then I will deal with that over Goldman Saches any day of the week.




rulemylife -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 5:26:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


In my estimation, well over half of the people I know smoke cigaretttes. Of them most avoid going to establishments such as restaurants, I know I do. There are a few who violate this "law" and their businesses seem to be doing quite well, for example at my Father's funeral most smoked. Not at the funeral but the thing after, like the party. Well I paid for that and selected a decent bar with a party room for this event. Of course smoking was allowed. Law schmaw. Other places charge a buck to use an ashtray, and that money goes to pay the fine in case they get busted. For a commercial establishment that can be up to $1,500 I think.

So the point is we have plenty of restaurants in Ohio, and a friend of mine just got back from Chicago. I think it was in Indiana it took him a minute to realize that he could enjoy his after dinner smoke at a reastaurant. My Mother goes to casinos, get this, WITH NON-SMOKERS ! They and her will still be leaving the state to gamble elsewhere, even if there is a casino down the street. That means even friends of smokers will leave their dollars elsewhere.

I have read some of the words of the founding Fathers of this nation, and I have gleaned that their considered opinon was that democracy always seems to shoot itself in the foot. If the government can usurp your rights now, a democracy allows your neighbors to do the same. Kapeesh ?



What about when your rights come into conflict with mine?

Do I not have the right to go into a bar without having to breathe second-hand smoke and when I go home not having to wash my clothes because they smell like an ashtray?




eyesopened -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 5:31:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Now what makes the most sense is to make tobacco an illegal substance. Any other consumer product that has been liked to as few as 10 deaths gets pulled off the market immediately! But state and federal government loves money more than the health of its people. Until governments stop talking out both sides of their faces on tobacco use, let people smoke or ban the substance altogether!

Then we have to look at banning alcohol again... and we all know how well that worked the first time. Besides, smoking and drinking are the two vices of politicians that no one will spin during an election.


tazzygirl, I get where you are coming from but smoking tobacco is different than alcohol.  If I sit next to a drinker, it won't effect me whatsoever.  The smoking ban in restaurants and the like come from the claim that second-hand smoke is a hazard.  I could take a drink of wine every day and most studies claim this has healthful benefits.  Smoking even one cigarette a day cannot make the same claim.  Abuse of alcohol is dangerous whereas use of tobacco is dangerous.




pahunkboy -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 5:46:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Now what makes the most sense is to make tobacco an illegal substance. Any other consumer product that has been liked to as few as 10 deaths gets pulled off the market immediately! But state and federal government loves money more than the health of its people. Until governments stop talking out both sides of their faces on tobacco use, let people smoke or ban the substance altogether!

Then we have to look at banning alcohol again... and we all know how well that worked the first time. Besides, smoking and drinking are the two vices of politicians that no one will spin during an election.


tazzygirl, I get where you are coming from but smoking tobacco is different than alcohol.  If I sit next to a drinker, it won't effect me whatsoever.  The smoking ban in restaurants and the like come from the claim that second-hand smoke is a hazard.  I could take a drink of wine every day and most studies claim this has healthful benefits.  Smoking even one cigarette a day cannot make the same claim.  Abuse of alcohol is dangerous whereas use of tobacco is dangerous.



but in a one world government- this exemplifies how one size fits all and local control is not the rule.

consider how this is just the start of centralized power.

which is what the NWO is all about.




ElizabethAnne -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 5:54:58 AM)

Hello Folks,

I live in Ohio, and even if I didn't smoke, I would detest this law.   I believe individual rights, yes, to the non smoker that says, what about my rights?   I think it would be all to easy for bars/restaurants to have a sign on their door - smoking is allowed, or smoking is not allowed.  If someone WANTED to go there, it's THEIR choice.  This law has taken away more rights.  I don't see how if a person owns the restaurant, pays taxes how it is considered "public"; it IS a private establishment.  

And to the person that said something about commercial vehicles - yes you are correct; it's illegal in Ohio for a person to smoke in any licensed vehicle that is commercial.  While I have not heard of anyone being fined for that, it IS illegal.  So for the owner operator driving his OWN rig, by the law, he cannot smoke in his truck.

For awhile, private places - such as the Eagles/Moose ect - there was some sort of clause to allow smoking, and I'm not sure what happened, but I know that too is illegal now. 

I  can understand and would fully support a law requiring any type of establishment to have it stated clearly if they allowed smoking.  THAT gives the rights BACK to the individual - you go there, it's YOUR choice.

Take care,

Elizabeth




eyesopened -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 6:10:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElizabethAnne

Hello Folks,

I live in Ohio, and even if I didn't smoke, I would detest this law.   I believe individual rights, yes, to the non smoker that says, what about my rights?   I think it would be all to easy for bars/restaurants to have a sign on their door - smoking is allowed, or smoking is not allowed.  If someone WANTED to go there, it's THEIR choice.  This law has taken away more rights.  I don't see how if a person owns the restaurant, pays taxes how it is considered "public"; it IS a private establishment.  

Elizabeth



Which is why I love what Georgia did.  A minor cannot consent to being in a smoke-filled restaurant.  They cannot consent to second-hand smoke.  By allowing smoking only in establishments that limit patrons to 18 or older, they take away the concern that a 5 year old may be exposed to smoke.  People have a choice in the types of businesses they wish to patronize.  Businesses can make a choice as to which customers they wish to attract.




rulemylife -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 6:13:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElizabethAnne

Hello Folks,

I live in Ohio, and even if I didn't smoke, I would detest this law.   I believe individual rights, yes, to the non smoker that says, what about my rights?   I think it would be all to easy for bars/restaurants to have a sign on their door - smoking is allowed, or smoking is not allowed.  If someone WANTED to go there, it's THEIR choice.  This law has taken away more rights.  I don't see how if a person owns the restaurant, pays taxes how it is considered "public"; it IS a private establishment.  

And to the person that said something about commercial vehicles - yes you are correct; it's illegal in Ohio for a person to smoke in any licensed vehicle that is commercial.  While I have not heard of anyone being fined for that, it IS illegal.  So for the owner operator driving his OWN rig, by the law, he cannot smoke in his truck.

For awhile, private places - such as the Eagles/Moose ect - there was some sort of clause to allow smoking, and I'm not sure what happened, but I know that too is illegal now. 

I  can understand and would fully support a law requiring any type of establishment to have it stated clearly if they allowed smoking.  THAT gives the rights BACK to the individual - you go there, it's YOUR choice.

Take care,

Elizabeth



Except when smoking is permitted everywhere, then it is not my choice unless I choose to stay home and never go out.

Why should the onus be on me as a non-smoker to allow your right to smoke?

What about my right not to breathe your smoke?







eyesopened -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 6:27:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Except when smoking is permitted everywhere, then it is not my choice unless I choose to stay home and never go out.

Why should the onus be on me as a non-smoker to allow your right to smoke?

What about my right not to breathe your smoke?



It's a legitimate question.  Whose rights are better rights?  What ElizabethAnn proposed is a sign much like the signs that warn that peanut products are used and microwaves are used.  It would not prevent you from going to smoke-free establishments.  In Georgia, you can go to Applebees to get a burger and I can go to The Vortex.  You want the best burger in America, at an establishment that provides premium parking for motorcycles,  you'll have to put up with the smoke. And the bikers.  Sorry.

Why should the onus be on private business?  They don't want you in their restaurant that should be up to them.  Sorry, but you do not have a right to eat at The Vortex.




ElizabethAnne -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 6:33:55 AM)

Hello Rule,

If you really read my post, you will see where I agree with a law requiring any type of establishment to have to POST if they allow smoking or not.  So if they do allow smoking YOU as an individual  could choose not to go there, YOUR choice, or go to establishments that do NOT allow smoking.  But it's a fair choice for each individual; as it stands now in Ohio it is not.  Especially for the restaurant/bar owners - they have been hurt financially.  Not all but many.  How is that fair to them? It's a PRIVATE business, on PRIVATE property.   Where is their choice?

I agree eyesopened, Georgia seems to have the right idea.

Take care,

Elizabeth




pahunkboy -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 6:41:12 AM)

I have to say- that I prefer local control.  
(over centralized power)

a large % of people DO smoke in the area here.   I think now- you must be a member for the eagles- and not a guest- to get in.
via the smoking law.

there are a marriad of reasons why I would not want to frequent ABC widgit place. 

The smoking -non smoking in restaurants was often done shabbily.    Horribly.

Be that as it may- I avoid crowds and don't get out much.... that is just me.  I don't see how it hurts to let small places decide for themself how to proceed.

Jenny goes out- and she says they smoke.    But the whole bar thing- is -- not something I crave at 46.

Camping-is a different story.








kittinSol -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 6:50:55 AM)

What about restaurant and bar workers, who neither own nor patronise the establishments? Should workers stick to jobs that make them sick with smoke, especially in the present economic climate?




tazzygirl -> RE: Just the place for this - smoking & Ohio (1/8/2010 6:58:30 AM)

ah kittin. my view on that is this.... you hire on to a place knowing the kind of establishment you are entering. you cannot complain about nudity at a strip joint if you hire on as a cocktail waitress there. you cannot complain about gambling if you hire on at a casino. if a business knowingly allows smoking, tells you smoking is allowed, and you still accept the job, then would it not be with complete knowledge that you accept the position and therefore the risks?




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375