RE: choices

RE: choices (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

osf -> RE: choices (1/13/2010 12:10:37 PM)
i don't really mind so much the natural evolution of the thread but not right off and the wild vectors some come in and create i don't consider that natural evolution but more akin to laboratory fruit flys

LillyoftheVally -> RE: choices (1/13/2010 12:13:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf i don't really mind so much the natural evolution of the thread but not right off and the wild vectors some come in and create Maybe so, I guess something that could prevent that is you ignore things like that rather than rise to every post? This exchange has been three posts, the original was trying to relate to your op but instead you have taken it down this line, you could have picked on my other point in the last post directly related to the question asked in the OP but chose to pick up on the other to enable your complaining.

osf -> RE: choices (1/13/2010 4:26:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally quote: ORIGINAL: osf i don't really mind so much the natural evolution of the thread but not right off and the wild vectors some come in and create Maybe so, I guess something that could prevent that is you ignore things like that rather than rise to every post? This exchange has been three posts, the original was trying to relate to your op but instead you have taken it down this line, you could have picked on my other point in the last post directly related to the question asked in the OP but chose to pick up on the other to enable your complaining. after enduring this for as long as i have, sometimes i slip and get defensive, something i try to avoid but it happens i'm getting better at it though i have never seen anything like this,

littlebitxxx -> RE: choices (1/14/2010 1:43:58 AM)
IMOO No two people are compatible on every single life issue whether it be kink, relationship, character traits, personality traits, hobbies....whatever. This one, being a slave, is more into the relationship side of things rather than the recreational. If she submits to Him, she submits to pleasing Him in whatever fashion that takes. If some of His "kinks" or otherwise recreational ideas are not quite to her liking....so what? If they please Him, so be it. That's why she's there. One of the other posters had it correctly in her mind (forget who it was) when it was said that the One with the presence enough to get the submission can lead the kink. It can't go the other way. This one has seen relationships compatible on every level of personality and kink but there was no Mastery whatsoever, hence no M/s dynamic. Without the foundation, the kinky house of cards falls.

ranja -> RE: choices (1/14/2010 1:44:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally quote: ORIGINAL: osf i don't really mind so much the natural evolution of the thread but not right off and the wild vectors some come in and create Maybe so, I guess something that could prevent that is you ignore things like that rather than rise to every post? This exchange has been three posts, the original was trying to relate to your op but instead you have taken it down this line, you could have picked on my other point in the last post directly related to the question asked in the OP but chose to pick up on the other to enable your complaining. i agree with Lilly, mr Osf it seems that you have a tendency to help along the derailment of your own threads by feeding the irrelevant... which i think is a pity because it invites petty arguments and makes things tedius and boring. But maybe that is what you like and you do it on purpose?

osf -> RE: choices (1/14/2010 6:00:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ranja quote: ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally quote: ORIGINAL: osf i don't really mind so much the natural evolution of the thread but not right off and the wild vectors some come in and create Maybe so, I guess something that could prevent that is you ignore things like that rather than rise to every post? This exchange has been three posts, the original was trying to relate to your op but instead you have taken it down this line, you could have picked on my other point in the last post directly related to the question asked in the OP but chose to pick up on the other to enable your complaining. i agree with Lilly, mr Osf it seems that you have a tendency to help along the derailment of your own threads by feeding the irrelevant... which i think is a pity because it invites petty arguments and makes things tedius and boring. But maybe that is what you like and you do it on purpose? no , i don't like it when things get derailed but there have been instances in other threads when i held my peace and it would go on post after post after post anyway but lately things have been calming down as more women have spoken up against the disrupters and i thank them for it

jujubeeMB -> RE: choices (1/14/2010 9:48:43 AM)
Really don't agree that people saying "neither" is "things getting derailed," osf. And this is not your "home" where you have full reign over everything that gets said; this is a public forum on the internet. It's the community's home - we're all visiting - and you just threw a question out to the group. It's incredibly normal and respectful to answer "neither" to the question you asked - haven't you ever discussed a hypothetical question in a conversation before?

osf -> RE: choices (1/14/2010 10:14:21 AM)
carry on

amberseeks -> RE: choices (1/14/2010 8:56:36 PM)
.

lexey -> RE: choices (1/22/2010 4:29:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally A lot of people don't understand what they need because they are preoccupied by what they want. I think that statement is particularly brilliant. Back to topic- Kink can vary and change. Force of nature doesn't. Door #2 please.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125