RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


hardbodysub -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 2:11:43 PM)

quote:

It's a stereotype that submissive men aren't masculine. Submissive men are confident, intelligent, dominant men with a desire for feminine charm and a need female leadership and authority.


Yes, the first is a stereotype. But neither are all submissive men confident, intelligent, etc. They come in all sizes, shapes, colors, and flavors, just like everybody else.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 2:33:17 PM)

quote:

Factoid on the alpha male re dogs. As a greyhound adoption activist, would like to point out that in the world of greyhounds, the breed lives in packs. The pack leader or alpha is Always a female.


Oooooh! Kind of like Lockit, the leader of the leader of the pact ;-)

And thank you for chiming in. Your words are a welcome contribution to all here I'm sure :-)

- LA




DommeMae -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 2:35:44 PM)

Um hum and be a big boy and just assume when someone leaves out the word: all, they already know it could never be "all" realistically.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 2:36:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
I can't help but think some of this debate/discussion about how a man CAN be "submissive" and at the same time be "a man"  -- or, assertive, aggressive, self confident, ambitious -- isn't also rooted from the problem of the * perception of male submission based on male fantasy and porn*.  Specifically, it's the men who idealize/eroticize "submission" as anti-masculine, or glorify the "pathetic worm," or worse, emphasize the ideal that being submissive means freedom from the responsibility of choice, freedom from risk (especially emotional risk), freedom from INITIATIVE.

Meanwhile, when you look at women who have (independent of all influence of male porn) developed a taste for female domination, and our ideals about what a "man" is (a man we desire to dominate, as well as the "man he becomes" when he is under our influence) are very different from the meek, the unassertive, the groveling type who seeks total and complete control from an uber-bitch.   I think, while our tastes very, we all pretty much seek the same qualities we do in a vanilla partner, but often with a heightened emphasis on chivalry, self confidence, and self sufficiency.

I've struggled hard to come up with good words to define my ideals.  In mean, I seek "capability" as a core component.  What I seek to get from him, as a result of my dominance, is "authentic vulnerability" - and this does not mean he's weak, pathetic or useless.  Moreso, it's BETTER when achieved from a man who is, at the same time, incredibly strong of character, unwavering, and devoted in that he offers THIS submission to one person : ME.

Akasha



As always, right on the money Akasha!

- LA




stiv2009 -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 3:35:35 PM)



quote:

I've struggled hard to come up with good words to define my ideals. In mean, I seek "capability" as a core component. What I seek to get from him, as a result of my dominance, is "authentic vulnerability"


Great formulation - "authentic vulnerability" - but is it something that just is, (like say, oil in the ground, which merely is, or is not there) - or is it something that can be nurtured/cultivated/expanded/reduced?

Steve




LadyAngelika -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 3:41:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stiv2009



quote:

I've struggled hard to come up with good words to define my ideals. In mean, I seek "capability" as a core component. What I seek to get from him, as a result of my dominance, is "authentic vulnerability"


Great formulation - "authentic vulnerability" - but is it something that just is, (like say, oil in the ground, which merely is, or is not there) - or is it something that can be nurtured/cultivated/expanded/reduced?

Steve


I would venture to guess it has to be there. But like oil, it can be there under the surface, be discovered and eventually tapped into.

- LA




AAkasha -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 4:07:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

ORIGINAL: stiv2009



quote:

I've struggled hard to come up with good words to define my ideals. In mean, I seek "capability" as a core component. What I seek to get from him, as a result of my dominance, is "authentic vulnerability"


Great formulation - "authentic vulnerability" - but is it something that just is, (like say, oil in the ground, which merely is, or is not there) - or is it something that can be nurtured/cultivated/expanded/reduced?

Steve


I would venture to guess it has to be there. But like oil, it can be there under the surface, be discovered and eventually tapped into.

- LA


Yes - that's what I would say also.  And another point about it is this: It takes a great deal of humility for a man to go there, and a great deal of strength and pride all mixed into one.  I would also say *bravery* plays a role, but I don't want to discount it all by sounding melodramatic.  All of this is the case, though, only if it is really "authentic vulnerability" and not "submission oozing in self indulgence."  I have a hard time with "self indulgence" messing things up for me - when a man seems like he's way, way, too into it - that's not to say I don't want his submission to be willing and for him to take great pleasure in it - but I prefer that the pleasure come from my pleasure in his vulnerability, not just him getting excited about the acts themselves.

The thing about "authentic vulnerability" is that I believe - kind of - that this appeals to women in the mainstream, in many cases, too.  How many movies have romanticized the strong, leading man type when he's at a point of real humility and vulnerability, emotionally and/or otherwise, for a woman he wants? When he's willing to take that "risk" -- the risk of humility, lowering his pride, potentially putting his ego on the line.  This holds great appeal for many women I believe, but only when it comes from a man of strength of character, pride and self assuredness -- not when it comes so readily and easily and self indulgently and/or from a "pushover" type. If that makes any sense.

Of course, no examples come to mind from mainstream, but I know it when I see it.  Anytime a "leading man" who plays a role of strength in a romantic movie but he's dropped all his defenses, become ultimately emotionally vulnerable and leaves himself open to danger that way, in a sense.  I think it's a more common theme than probably believed - and what makes it powerful is that his devotion puts him there (despite his ego defenses telling him no) and it is totally unselfish.

Akasha




PeonForHer -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 5:07:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

It takes a great deal of humility for a man to go there, and a great deal of strength and pride all mixed into one.  I would also say *bravery* plays a role, but I don't want to discount it all by sounding melodramatic. 


I'd go with 'bravery'. Why hedge our bets?  If we're going to talk of submission as a genuinely masculine thing to do, we might as well use the words that best convey such masculinity.  Let's leave the tired old 'is it masculine or not?' question totally in the past, I say.

quote:



Of course, no examples come to mind from mainstream, but I know it when I see it.  Anytime a "leading man" who plays a role of strength in a romantic movie but he's dropped all his defenses, become ultimately emotionally vulnerable and leaves himself open to danger that way, in a sense.  I think it's a more common theme than probably believed - and what makes it powerful is that his devotion puts him there (despite his ego defenses telling him no) and it is totally unselfish.


Russell Crowe in LA Confidential.  He's a borderline psycho of a thuggish cop who, nevertheless, sees it as his mission to protect women.  He gets together with Kim Basinger but later finds that she's bedded his colleague.  He doesn't know that she was forced into it.  A terrible, heart-rending scene where he finds out, he hits her, cries (partly because he's hit her) - then she cries, not because she's been hurt but because she feels such anguish at seeing him so wounded by her inadvertently attacking his one and only vulnerability. 

Well, it worked for me, anyway.  First film and scene that came to mind when I read your comment.  I'm sure there are tons of others that serve as good examples.







Politesub53 -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 5:19:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DommeMae

Fear not, tiny but deadly ninja, we women always find ways to put men to use ... even those ... less endowed Tiny Tim men, like you. [;)]



How did you know we are all named Tim ? [8D]




WantingToServe11 -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 5:19:23 PM)

Though I submit; I consider myself a masculine person. For instance, I take care of myself: pay my own bills, go to school, work full-time, eat healthy, and the works with out anyone giving me directions on how to do these things. Also, I have ambition and goals that I have set for myself; I plan on accomplishing these goals by doing anything it takes, unless, it's dangerous or morally wrong. Thirdly, I stand for what I believe and I won't let anyone denture me from doing so. I have moral principles that I follow to the tea, and I set myself to a higher standard than most. In essence, I'm a man of my word and I walk my talk. If you don't consider these characteristics to be masculine then I have to tell you to take your opinion of me and my activities and shove it. Last time I checked, I don't submit for anyone other than the person I chose to submit to, and I also don't exist per your opinion of me either.




PeonForHer -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 5:35:58 PM)

If you don't consider these characteristics to be masculine then I have to tell you to take your opinion of me and my activities and shove it.

Good!  My sentiment exactly.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 5:53:28 PM)


My my WantingToServe11! Did I just sense a testosterone hike on the thread? ;-)

I'm curious, that message came into response to Peon, was it? Because though I know he can get so cheeky that you wanna smack him, I don't think that he has been saying anything different than what it is that you were saying.

And if it wasn't directed at Peon, who was it directed to? Or was it just a general rant directed at no one?

In any case, congrats on your first post. Welcome to the boards!

- LA




PeonForHer -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 5:57:05 PM)

I took WantingToServe's comment as a kind of shout against the world in general, Lady A - I meant it when I said I supported it.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 6:00:26 PM)

Sometimes you boys just have to shout at the world! ;-)

- LA




PeonForHer -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 6:05:11 PM)

Winking is unfeminine, Lady A.




WantingToServe11 -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 6:06:25 PM)

My last post was directed, mostly, to people like Psychonaut23. One thing I have noticed with some dominant males is that they do look down on submissive males. Some of them, Psychonaut is a good example of this, are so narrow minded and mentally helpless that I felt being concise and extremely serious would be the only way to help him understand my mentality and the mentality of other submissives (both female and male). 




LadyAngelika -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 6:10:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Winking is unfeminine, Lady A.


Is it?

[image]http://awsmposters.com.au/catalog/images/betty%20boop%20pink.jpg[/image]

- LA




LadyAngelika -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 6:14:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11

My last post was directed, mostly, to people like Psychonaut23. One thing I have noticed with some dominant males is that they do look down on submissive males. Some of them, Psychonaut is a good example of this, are so narrow minded and mentally helpless that I felt being concise and extremely serious would be the only way to help him understand my mentality and the mentality of other submissives (both female and male). 


Pychonaut is not a dominant male, not by my standards. A strong dominant man would never behave in such a fashion. He would show more self-control, respect and concern for others.

He is simply an angry young man who likes to boss people around because it makes him feel better. He confuses abuse with dominance.

- LA




seekingOwnertoo -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 7:10:07 PM)

just <chuckles> .... thats my two cents worth ... tonight !!!!!!!




LadyPact -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/17/2010 9:32:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11

My last post was directed, mostly, to people like Psychonaut23. One thing I have noticed with some dominant males is that they do look down on submissive males. Some of them, Psychonaut is a good example of this, are so narrow minded and mentally helpless that I felt being concise and extremely serious would be the only way to help him understand my mentality and the mentality of other submissives (both female and male). 

Please don't judge all in a category by one who doesn't even have the experience with submissive males to even be able to base his opinions on any sort of fact.  Within the context of this thread, he admitted to not knowing *any* submissive males or femdoms except what he had encountered on the internet. 

In My experience, the majority of Dominant males do not feel the same way.  The reason for this is quite simple.  They are involved with submissive females in the real world and know what strength it takes to submit.  Some of them have even taken the submissive role themselves prior to being a Dominant, so they have first hand knowledge of being in that position.  Gender doesn't have a thing to do with it if you look at what the role entails.

Don't judge Dominant males solely on the ignorance of some fool who isn't even properly educated on the subject.




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0390625