quote:

ORIGINAL: Santoro

Personally, I do not argue the point of am I masculine; neither do I attempt to justify submission. Nor do I allow others to impose their thinking or in any way question the content of my character or the honor codes guiding me. In fact, I really like and respect the man of me both as a submissive and as a man.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Santoro
I really like and respect the man of me both as a submissive and as a man.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11

My last post was directed, mostly, to people like Psychonaut23. One thing I have noticed with some dominant males is that they do look down on submissive males. Some of them, Psychonaut is a good example of this, are so narrow minded and mentally helpless that I felt being concise and extremely serious would be the only way to help him understand my mentality and the mentality of other submissives (both female and male). 

Pychonaut is not a dominant male, not by my standards. A strong dominant man would never behave in such a fashion. He would show more self-control, respect and concern for others.

He is simply an angry young man who likes to boss people around because it makes him feel better. He confuses abuse with dominance.

- LA

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

In My experience, the majority of Dominant males do not feel the same way.  The reason for this is quite simple.  They are involved with submissive females in the real world and know what strength it takes to submit.  Some of them have even taken the submissive role themselves prior to being a Dominant, so they have first hand knowledge of being in that position.  Gender doesn't have a thing to do with it if you look at what the role entails.

Don't judge Dominant males solely on the ignorance of some fool who isn't even properly educated on the subject.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11

My last post was directed, mostly, to people like Psychonaut23. One thing I have noticed with some dominant males is that they do look down on submissive males. Some of them, Psychonaut is a good example of this, are so narrow minded and mentally helpless that I felt being concise and extremely serious would be the only way to help him understand my mentality and the mentality of other submissives (both female and male). 

quote:

ORIGINAL: JBGolden

Yeah, I concur with LadyPact. I'm not submissive but I respect the fellas that decide they are. If it's what you want then rock on with your bad selves. [8D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009

Hey Psychonaut,
i'm not sure if you realize it, but i think the mods have put you in "time out" or something.  All of your messages simply say "awaiting approval".  So you may as well stop posting responses that none of us can read until they grant you your freedom.  [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Oh!  I thought that everything was pretty much the same in Canada as it is in the US, except that...banjo-playing isn't a compulsory subject in schools. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: QueenRah

Again, another successful thread. Great OP - many interesting responses. Thanks to all but one of you. (You all know whom I'm excluding, yes?)

QR

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: QueenRah

Again, another successful thread. Great OP - many interesting responses. Thanks to all but one of you. (You all know whom I'm excluding, yes?)

QR

Would you call it successful? I feel like we got away from the (very interesting) original topic, and onto another (also interesting) discussion about whether submissive males are still masculine.

Other than a reference Lady Angelika gave to taking subs out to buy proper suits, there wasn't much discussion of how you would actually go about 'forced gentlemanization' (which is what this idea has now become called in my head, seeing as the word 'masculine' seemed to confuse a few people).

Now that psychonaut has been gagged, please could we actually talk about it, Lady Angelika? It's not quite my cup of tea, being mostly into women, but it sounds fascinating!

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: QueenRah

Again, another successful thread. Great OP - many interesting responses. Thanks to all but one of you. (You all know whom I'm excluding, yes?)

QR

Would you call it successful? I feel like we got away from the (very interesting) original topic, and onto another (also interesting) discussion about whether submissive males are still masculine.

Other than a reference Lady Angelika gave to taking subs out to buy proper suits, there wasn't much discussion of how you would actually go about 'forced gentlemanization' (which is what this idea has now become called in my head, seeing as the word 'masculine' seemed to confuse a few people).

Now that psychonaut has been gagged, please could we actually talk about it, Lady Angelika? It's not quite my cup of tea, being mostly into women, but it sounds fascinating!

Well the conversation was interesting, regardless of whether it was the intended OP or not.

Maybe I need to start a thread entitled Gentlemen Prefer Dommes. ;-)

- LA

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: QueenRah

Again, another successful thread. Great OP - many interesting responses. Thanks to all but one of you. (You all know whom I'm excluding, yes?)

QR

Would you call it successful? I feel like we got away from the (very interesting) original topic, and onto another (also interesting) discussion about whether submissive males are still masculine.

Other than a reference Lady Angelika gave to taking subs out to buy proper suits, there wasn't much discussion of how you would actually go about 'forced gentlemanization' (which is what this idea has now become called in my head, seeing as the word 'masculine' seemed to confuse a few people).

Now that psychonaut has been gagged, please could we actually talk about it, Lady Angelika? It's not quite my cup of tea, being mostly into women, but it sounds fascinating!